<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 18:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-03351</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-03351</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-03351</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-03351</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-53063</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53063</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53063</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-1031 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1031</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-1031</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1031</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2024-46420</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46420</link>
      <description>cnvd-2024-46420</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46420</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-371935</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-371935</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-371935</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-371935</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-53063</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53063</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set
or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for
boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to
dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption
that the register functions already did the needed checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be fragile if some device ends using different
calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers
like Coverity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set
or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for
boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to
dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption
that the register functions already did the needed checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be fragile if some device ends using different
calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers
like Coverity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53063</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7hwj-x2vh-jqv9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7hwj-x2vh-jqv9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set
or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for
boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to
dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption
that the register functions already did the needed checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be fragile if some device ends using different
calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers
like Coverity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set
or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for
boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to
dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption
that the register functions already did the needed checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be fragile if some device ends using different
calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers
like Coverity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7hwj-x2vh-jqv9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-25-226-07 — Siemens Third-Party Components in SINEC OS</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-53063 — media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53063</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-53063</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53063</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2492 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2492</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking  Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it *and* potentially adjusting offset.  To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction history. We don&amp;amp;apos;t touch idx field for maximum performance, as it&amp;amp;apos;s checked most frequently during backtracking.  This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of verified states, explored in the subsequent patches.  There are only three differences in selftests&amp;amp;apos; BPF object files according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states).  File                                    Program        Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns  (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF) --------------------------------------  -------------  ---------  ---------  -------------  ----------  ----------  ------------- test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking  Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it *and* potentially adjusting offset.  To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction history. We don&amp;amp;apos;t touch idx field for maximum performance, as it&amp;amp;apos;s checked most frequently during backtracking.  This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of verified states, explored in the subsequent patches.  There are only three differences in selftests&amp;amp;apos; BPF object files according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states).  File                                    Program        Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns  (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF) --------------------------------------  -------------  ---------  ---------  -------------  ----------  ----------  ------------- test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2492</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-355557 — SSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:4313-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4313-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4313-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53063</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53063</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 194 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors. The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it. On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption that the register functions already did the needed checks. This can be fragile if some device ends using different calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers like Coverity. So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 194 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: dvbdev: prevent the risk of out of memory access The dvbdev contains a static variable used to store dvb minors. The behavior of it depends if CONFIG_DVB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is set or not. When not set, dvb_register_device() won&amp;#39;t check for boundaries, as it will rely that a previous call to dvb_register_adapter() would already be enforcing it. On a similar way, dvb_device_open() uses the assumption that the register functions already did the needed checks. This can be fragile if some device ends using different calls. This also generate warnings on static check analysers like Coverity. So, add explicit guards to prevent potential risk of OOM issues.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53063</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3509 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
