<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 23:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-202580</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-202580</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-202580</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-202580</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-52296</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-52296</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-52296</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp — LibOSDP vulnerable to a null pointer deref in osdp_reply_name</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7945-5mcv-f2pp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: libosdp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Issue:
At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (`name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];`). Null name will casue a crash on next line: `if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;)` as null[0] is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Attack:
As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of Service&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patch
The issue has been patched in 24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: libosdp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Issue:
At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (`name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];`). Null name will casue a crash on next line: `if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;)` as null[0] is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Attack:
As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of Service&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patch
The issue has been patched in 24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7945-5mcv-f2pp</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-1534 — LibOSDP vulnerable to a null pointer deref in osdp_reply_name</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-1534</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: libosdp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Issue:
At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (`name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];`). Null name will casue a crash on next line: `if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;)` as null[0] is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Attack:
As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of Service&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patch
The issue has been patched in 24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: libosdp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Issue:
At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (`name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];`). Null name will casue a crash on next line: `if (name[0] == &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39;)` as null[0] is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Attack:
As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of Service&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patch
The issue has been patched in 24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-1534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
