<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0214 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquan…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0214</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0214</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0214</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: CLEANSTART-2026-AQ94704 — Previously, after a channel has been established, a malicious peer could send crafted messages that would deadlock the…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-aq94704</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: minio-operator&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the minio-operator package. Previously, after a channel has been established, a malicious peer could send crafted messages that would deadlock the entire connection. See references for individual vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: minio-operator&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the minio-operator package. Previously, after a channel has been established, a malicious peer could send crafted messages that would deadlock the entire connection. See references for individual vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-aq94704</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-199336</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-199336</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-199336</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-199336</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-51744</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-51744</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-51744</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r — Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-29wx-vh33-7x7r</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have back-ported the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workaround&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```Go
token, err := /* jwt.Parse or similar */
if token.Valid {
	fmt.Println(&amp;#34;You look nice today&amp;#34;)
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenMalformed) {
	fmt.Println(&amp;#34;That&amp;#39;s not even a token&amp;#34;)
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenUnv…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have back-ported the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workaround&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```Go
token, err := /* jwt.Parse or similar */
if token.Valid {
	fmt.Println(&amp;#34;You look nice today&amp;#34;)
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenMalformed) {
	fmt.Println(&amp;#34;That&amp;#39;s not even a token&amp;#34;)
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenUnv…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-29wx-vh33-7x7r</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-51744 — Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations in golang-jwt</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-51744</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-51744</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-51744</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2024:14484-1 — govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20241112T145010-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:14484-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20241112T145010-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20241112T145010-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:14484-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:11351 — Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.55 bug fix and security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:11351</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt: Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations in golang-jwt golang.org/x/oauth2/jws: Unexpected memory consumption during token parsing in golang.org/x/oauth2/jws&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt: Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations in golang-jwt golang.org/x/oauth2/jws: Unexpected memory consumption during token parsing in golang.org/x/oauth2/jws&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:11351</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:4042-1 — Security update for govulncheck-vulndb</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4042-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for govulncheck-vulndb&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for govulncheck-vulndb&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4042-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-51744</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-51744</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5, Ubuntu:25.10: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:25.10: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5, Ubuntu:25.10: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:25.10: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt-v5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors (&amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-51744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
