<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-06484</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-06484</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-06484</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-06484</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-48875</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-48875</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-48875</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0254 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0254</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0254</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0254</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313365</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313365</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313365</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313365</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-48875</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-48875</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of
the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 lock held by btrfs/2326:
  #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80
  __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x19d/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of
the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 lock held by btrfs/2326:
  #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80
  __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x19d/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-48875</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-hg9v-mfmx-jx2x</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hg9v-mfmx-jx2x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of
the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 lock held by btrfs/2326:
  #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80
  __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x19d/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of
the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);
   lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 lock held by btrfs/2326:
  #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80
  __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x19d/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hg9v-mfmx-jx2x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-48875 — btrfs: don't take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-48875</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-48875</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-48875</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-48875</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-48875</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:  BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started  ============================================  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected  6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted  --------------------------------------------  btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:  ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  but task is already holding lock:  ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  other info that might help us debug this:   Possible unsafe locking scenario:         CPU0         ----    lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);    lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);   *** DEADLOCK ***   May be due to missing lock nesting notation  1 lock held by btrfs/2326:   #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  stack backtrace:  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599  Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011  Call Trace:   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;   dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80   __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0   ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10   ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10   lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0   ? b…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don&amp;#39;t take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS=&amp;#34;-O rst&amp;#34; to force the usage of the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:  BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started  ============================================  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected  6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted  --------------------------------------------  btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock:  ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  but task is already holding lock:  ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  other info that might help us debug this:   Possible unsafe locking scenario:         CPU0         ----    lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);    lock(&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem);   *** DEADLOCK ***   May be due to missing lock nesting notation  1 lock held by btrfs/2326:   #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&amp;amp;fs_info-&amp;gt;dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250  stack backtrace:  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599  Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011  Call Trace:   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;   dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80   __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0   ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10   ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10   lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0   ? b…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-48875</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0047 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0047</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
