<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 08:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-04638</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-04638</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-04638</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-04638</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-47141</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-47141</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-47141</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0088 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0088</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0088</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313327</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313327</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313327</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313327</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-47141</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-47141</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the
same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin
and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got
updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {
  pin_request() {				pin_request() {
  ...
						 ....
    } else {
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;
    						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)
               return 0;
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}						}&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the
same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin
and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got
updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {
  pin_request() {				pin_request() {
  ...
						 ....
    } else {
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;
    						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)
               return 0;
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}						}&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-47141</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-ff75-3hc4-j344</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ff75-3hc4-j344</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the
same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin
and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got
updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {
  pin_request() {				pin_request() {
  ...
						 ....
    } else {
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;
    						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)
               return 0;
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}						}&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the
same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin
and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got
updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing
desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {
  pin_request() {				pin_request() {
  ...
						 ....
    } else {
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;
    						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)
               return 0;
         desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}						}&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ff75-3hc4-j344</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-47141 — pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&gt;pinmux data</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-47141</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-47141</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-47141</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1110 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1110</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i3c: Use i3cdev-&amp;amp;gt;desc-&amp;amp;gt;info instead of calling i3c_device_get_info() to avoid deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A deadlock may happen since the i3c_master_register() acquires
&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock twice. See the log below.
Use i3cdev-&amp;amp;gt;desc-&amp;amp;gt;info instead of calling i3c_device_info() to
avoid acquiring the lock twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;v2:
  - Modified the title and commit message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-mainline
--------------------------------------------
init/1 is trying to acquire lock:
f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_bus_normaluse_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock);
  lock(&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2 locks held by init/1:
 #0: fcffff809b6798f8 (&amp;amp;amp;dev-&amp;amp;gt;mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach
 #1: f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0xfc/0x17c
 show_stack+0x18/0x28
 dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0xc0
 dump_stack+0x18/0x24
 print_deadlock_bug+0x388/0x390
 __lock_acquire+0x18bc/0…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i3c: Use i3cdev-&amp;amp;gt;desc-&amp;amp;gt;info instead of calling i3c_device_get_info() to avoid deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A deadlock may happen since the i3c_master_register() acquires
&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock twice. See the log below.
Use i3cdev-&amp;amp;gt;desc-&amp;amp;gt;info instead of calling i3c_device_info() to
avoid acquiring the lock twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;v2:
  - Modified the title and commit message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-mainline
--------------------------------------------
init/1 is trying to acquire lock:
f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_bus_normaluse_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock);
  lock(&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2 locks held by init/1:
 #0: fcffff809b6798f8 (&amp;amp;amp;dev-&amp;amp;gt;mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach
 #1: f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&amp;amp;amp;i3cbus-&amp;amp;gt;lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0xfc/0x17c
 show_stack+0x18/0x28
 dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0xc0
 dump_stack+0x18/0x24
 print_deadlock_bug+0x388/0x390
 __lock_acquire+0x18bc/0…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1110</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:6966 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:6966</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration kernel: fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie kernel: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed kernel: net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun_detach() kernel: hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails kernel: erofs/zmap.c: Fix incorrect offset calculation kernel: arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud kernel: s390: avoid using global register for current_stack_pointer kernel: erofs: fix missing xas_retry() in fscache mode kernel: rpmsg: qcom_smd: Fix refcount leak in qcom_smd_parse_edge kernel: remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init kernel: of: check previous kernel&amp;#39;s ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds kernel: coresight: Clear the connection field properly kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in coresight: trbe kernel: rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint kernel: coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() kernel: lib/fonts: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for get_default_font kernel: Kernel: Denial of Service in pci_endpoint_test due to zero-length DMA mapping kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in erofs due to memory leak kernel: erofs: fix missing unmap if z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen() fails kernel: pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage kernel: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() kernel: qed/qed_sriov: guard against NULL derefs from qed_…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration kernel: fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie kernel: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed kernel: net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun_detach() kernel: hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails kernel: erofs/zmap.c: Fix incorrect offset calculation kernel: arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud kernel: s390: avoid using global register for current_stack_pointer kernel: erofs: fix missing xas_retry() in fscache mode kernel: rpmsg: qcom_smd: Fix refcount leak in qcom_smd_parse_edge kernel: remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init kernel: of: check previous kernel&amp;#39;s ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds kernel: coresight: Clear the connection field properly kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in coresight: trbe kernel: rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint kernel: coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() kernel: lib/fonts: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for get_default_font kernel: Kernel: Denial of Service in pci_endpoint_test due to zero-length DMA mapping kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in erofs due to memory leak kernel: erofs: fix missing unmap if z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen() fails kernel: pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage kernel: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() kernel: qed/qed_sriov: guard against NULL derefs from qed_…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:6966</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:0236-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:0236-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:0236-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-47141</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-47141</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 197 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner. Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer. Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock. 	cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B) pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {   pin_request() {				pin_request() {   ... 						 ....     } else {          desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;     						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {          if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)                return 0;          desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;   }						}&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 197 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-&amp;gt;pinmux data When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner. Let&amp;#39;s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin and process A updates the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount but not yet updated the desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner while process B see the desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount which got updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer. Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock. 	cpu0 (process A)			cpu1(process B) pinctrl_select_state() {		  pinctrl_select_state() {   pin_request() {				pin_request() {   ... 						 ....     } else {          desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount++;     						desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;amp;&amp;amp; strcmp(desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner, owner)) {          if (desc-&amp;gt;mux_usecount &amp;gt; 1)                return 0;          desc-&amp;gt;mux_owner = owner;   }						}&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-47141</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0047 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0047</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
