<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-01654</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01654</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-01654</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01654</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-46840</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46840</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0837 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0837</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313309</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313309</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313309</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313309</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-46840</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46840</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-44xq-wgcc-3jwh</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-44xq-wgcc-3jwh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-44xq-wgcc-3jwh</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-25-226-07 — Siemens Third-Party Components in SINEC OS</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-46840 — btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-46840</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-46840</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-46840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2255 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2255</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/i915/gt: Cleanup partial engine discovery failures&#13;
&#13;
If we abort driver initialisation in the middle of gt/engine discovery,
some engines will be fully setup and some not. Those incompletely setup
engines only have &amp;amp;apos;engine-&amp;amp;gt;release == NULL&amp;amp;apos; and so will leak any of the
common objects allocated.&#13;
&#13;
v2:
 - Drop the destroy_pinned_context() helper for now.  It&amp;amp;apos;s not really
   worth it with just a single callsite at the moment.  (Janusz)(CVE-2022-48893)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption&#13;
&#13;
As Al reported in link[1]:&#13;
&#13;
f2fs_rename()
...
	if (old_dir != new_dir &amp;amp;amp;&amp;amp;amp; !whiteout)
		f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry,
					old_dir_page, new_dir);
	else
		f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);&#13;
&#13;
You want correct inumber in the &amp;amp;quot;..&amp;amp;quot; link.  And cross-directory
rename does move the source to new parent, even if you&amp;amp;apos;d been asked
to leave a whiteout in the old place.&#13;
&#13;
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/&#13;
&#13;
With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed
to call f2fs_set_link() to update &amp;amp;quot;..&amp;amp;quot; link to new directory.
- mkdir -p dir/foo
- renameat2 -w dir/foo bar&#13;
&#13;
[ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421)  --&amp;amp;gt; Bad inode number[0x4] for &amp;amp;apos;..&amp;amp;apos;, parent parent ino is [0…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/i915/gt: Cleanup partial engine discovery failures&#13;
&#13;
If we abort driver initialisation in the middle of gt/engine discovery,
some engines will be fully setup and some not. Those incompletely setup
engines only have &amp;amp;apos;engine-&amp;amp;gt;release == NULL&amp;amp;apos; and so will leak any of the
common objects allocated.&#13;
&#13;
v2:
 - Drop the destroy_pinned_context() helper for now.  It&amp;amp;apos;s not really
   worth it with just a single callsite at the moment.  (Janusz)(CVE-2022-48893)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption&#13;
&#13;
As Al reported in link[1]:&#13;
&#13;
f2fs_rename()
...
	if (old_dir != new_dir &amp;amp;amp;&amp;amp;amp; !whiteout)
		f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry,
					old_dir_page, new_dir);
	else
		f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);&#13;
&#13;
You want correct inumber in the &amp;amp;quot;..&amp;amp;quot; link.  And cross-directory
rename does move the source to new parent, even if you&amp;amp;apos;d been asked
to leave a whiteout in the old place.&#13;
&#13;
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/&#13;
&#13;
With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed
to call f2fs_set_link() to update &amp;amp;quot;..&amp;amp;quot; link to new directory.
- mkdir -p dir/foo
- renameat2 -w dir/foo bar&#13;
&#13;
[ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421)  --&amp;amp;gt; Bad inode number[0x4] for &amp;amp;apos;..&amp;amp;apos;, parent parent ino is [0…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2255</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-355557 — SSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3983-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-46840</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46840</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 187 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return -EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 187 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren&amp;#39;t holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return -EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3050 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3050</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
