<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-01936</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01936</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-01936</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01936</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-46734</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0837 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0837</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-346102</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346102</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-346102</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346102</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-46734</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of
them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a
race where we can end up either:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an
   assertion failures when assertions are enabled;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private
   points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be
   used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The race happens like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,
   while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread
   doing fsyncs;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the
   file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member
   &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private
   structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set
   to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to
   NULL since it had no…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of
them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a
race where we can end up either:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an
   assertion failures when assertions are enabled;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private
   points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be
   used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The race happens like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,
   while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread
   doing fsyncs;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the
   file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member
   &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private
   structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set
   to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to
   NULL since it had no…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-pw8w-hq42-r2hw</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pw8w-hq42-r2hw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of
them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a
race where we can end up either:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an
   assertion failures when assertions are enabled;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private
   points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be
   used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The race happens like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,
   while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread
   doing fsyncs;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the
   file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member
   &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private
   structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set
   to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to
   NULL since it had no…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of
them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a
race where we can end up either:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an
   assertion failures when assertions are enabled;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private
   points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be
   used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The race happens like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,
   while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread
   doing fsyncs;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the
   file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member
   &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private
   structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set
   to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to
   NULL since it had no…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pw8w-hq42-r2hw</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2219 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2219</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()&#13;
&#13;
set_memory_rox() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.&#13;
&#13;
Check return and bail out when bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() returns
an error.(CVE-2024-42067)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
sysctl: always initialize i_uid/i_gid&#13;
&#13;
Always initialize i_uid/i_gid inside the sysfs core so set_ownership()
can safely skip setting them.&#13;
&#13;
Commit 5ec27ec735ba (&amp;amp;quot;fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c: fix the default values of
i_uid/i_gid on /proc/sys inodes.&amp;amp;quot;) added defaults for i_uid/i_gid when
set_ownership() was not implemented. It also missed adjusting
net_ctl_set_ownership() to use the same default values in case the
computation of a better value failed.(CVE-2024-42312)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
parisc: fix a possible DMA corruption&#13;
&#13;
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN was defined as 16 - this is too small - it may be
possible that two unrelated 16-byte allocations share a cache line. If
one of these allocations is written using DMA and the other is written
using cached write, the value that was written with DMA may be
corrupted.&#13;
&#13;
This commit changes ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to be 128 on PA20 and 32 on PA1.1 -
that&amp;amp;apos;s the largest possible cache line size.&#13;
&#13;
As different parisc microarchitectur…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()&#13;
&#13;
set_memory_rox() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.&#13;
&#13;
Check return and bail out when bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() returns
an error.(CVE-2024-42067)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
sysctl: always initialize i_uid/i_gid&#13;
&#13;
Always initialize i_uid/i_gid inside the sysfs core so set_ownership()
can safely skip setting them.&#13;
&#13;
Commit 5ec27ec735ba (&amp;amp;quot;fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c: fix the default values of
i_uid/i_gid on /proc/sys inodes.&amp;amp;quot;) added defaults for i_uid/i_gid when
set_ownership() was not implemented. It also missed adjusting
net_ctl_set_ownership() to use the same default values in case the
computation of a better value failed.(CVE-2024-42312)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
parisc: fix a possible DMA corruption&#13;
&#13;
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN was defined as 16 - this is too small - it may be
possible that two unrelated 16-byte allocations share a cache line. If
one of these allocations is written using DMA and the other is written
using cached write, the value that was written with DMA may be
corrupted.&#13;
&#13;
This commit changes ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to be 128 on PA20 and 32 on PA1.1 -
that&amp;amp;apos;s the largest possible cache line size.&#13;
&#13;
As different parisc microarchitectur…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2219</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3551-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3551-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3551-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-46734</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 66 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an    assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private    points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be    used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,    while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread    doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the    file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member    &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private    structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set    to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to    NULL since it had no prior privat…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 66 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode&amp;#39;s lock, triggering an    assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private    points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be    used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes,    while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread    doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the    file&amp;#39;s private to an on stack allocated private with the member    &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there&amp;#39;s a private    structure associated to the file which has &amp;#39;fsync_skip_inode_lock&amp;#39; set    to true, so it skips locking the inode&amp;#39;s VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file&amp;#39;s private to    NULL since it had no prior privat…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-2173 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-2173</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-2173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
