<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-02976</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02976</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-02976</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02976</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-42315</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42315</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0779 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0779</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0779</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0779</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-320671</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-320671</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-320671</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-320671</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-42315</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42315</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                CPU1
       ----                ----
  kswapd
   balance_pgdat
    lock(fs_reclaim)
                      exfat_iterate
                       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)
                       exfat_readdir
                        exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
                         exfat_get_dentry_set
                          __exfat_get_dentry_set
                           kmalloc_array
                            ...
                            lock(fs_reclaim)
    ...
    evict
     exfat_evict_inode
      lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                CPU1
       ----                ----
  kswapd
   balance_pgdat
    lock(fs_reclaim)
                      exfat_iterate
                       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)
                       exfat_readdir
                        exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
                         exfat_get_dentry_set
                          __exfat_get_dentry_set
                           kmalloc_array
                            ...
                            lock(fs_reclaim)
    ...
    evict
     exfat_evict_inode
      lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-269x-4f35-gf3h</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-269x-4f35-gf3h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                CPU1
       ----                ----
  kswapd
   balance_pgdat
    lock(fs_reclaim)
                      exfat_iterate
                       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)
                       exfat_readdir
                        exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
                         exfat_get_dentry_set
                          __exfat_get_dentry_set
                           kmalloc_array
                            ...
                            lock(fs_reclaim)
    ...
    evict
     exfat_evict_inode
      lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                CPU1
       ----                ----
  kswapd
   balance_pgdat
    lock(fs_reclaim)
                      exfat_iterate
                       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)
                       exfat_readdir
                        exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
                         exfat_get_dentry_set
                          __exfat_get_dentry_set
                           kmalloc_array
                            ...
                            lock(fs_reclaim)
    ...
    evict
     exfat_evict_inode
      lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-269x-4f35-gf3h</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-42315 — exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-42315</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-42315</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-42315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2124 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2124</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated&#13;
&#13;
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from
userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don&amp;amp;apos;t
ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to
OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul
instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting&#13;
&#13;
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):&#13;
&#13;
 kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 ...
 RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
  e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt;
  0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
 ...
 Call Trace:
  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  &amp;amp;lt;…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated&#13;
&#13;
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from
userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don&amp;amp;apos;t
ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to
OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul
instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting&#13;
&#13;
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):&#13;
&#13;
 kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 ...
 RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
  e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt;
  0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
 ...
 Call Trace:
  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  &amp;amp;lt;…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2124</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:6966 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:6966</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration kernel: fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie kernel: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed kernel: net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun_detach() kernel: hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails kernel: erofs/zmap.c: Fix incorrect offset calculation kernel: arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud kernel: s390: avoid using global register for current_stack_pointer kernel: erofs: fix missing xas_retry() in fscache mode kernel: rpmsg: qcom_smd: Fix refcount leak in qcom_smd_parse_edge kernel: remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init kernel: of: check previous kernel&amp;#39;s ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds kernel: coresight: Clear the connection field properly kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in coresight: trbe kernel: rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint kernel: coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() kernel: lib/fonts: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for get_default_font kernel: Kernel: Denial of Service in pci_endpoint_test due to zero-length DMA mapping kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in erofs due to memory leak kernel: erofs: fix missing unmap if z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen() fails kernel: pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage kernel: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() kernel: qed/qed_sriov: guard against NULL derefs from qed_…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration kernel: fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie kernel: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed kernel: net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun_detach() kernel: hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails kernel: erofs/zmap.c: Fix incorrect offset calculation kernel: arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud kernel: s390: avoid using global register for current_stack_pointer kernel: erofs: fix missing xas_retry() in fscache mode kernel: rpmsg: qcom_smd: Fix refcount leak in qcom_smd_parse_edge kernel: remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init kernel: of: check previous kernel&amp;#39;s ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds kernel: coresight: Clear the connection field properly kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in coresight: trbe kernel: rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint kernel: coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() kernel: lib/fonts: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for get_default_font kernel: Kernel: Denial of Service in pci_endpoint_test due to zero-length DMA mapping kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service in erofs due to memory leak kernel: erofs: fix missing unmap if z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen() fails kernel: pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage kernel: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() kernel: qed/qed_sriov: guard against NULL derefs from qed_…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:6966</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3190-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3190-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3190-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-42315</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42315</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 127 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases, a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.        CPU0                CPU1        ----                ----   kswapd    balance_pgdat     lock(fs_reclaim)                       exfat_iterate                        lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)                        exfat_readdir                         exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry                          exfat_get_dentry_set                           __exfat_get_dentry_set                            kmalloc_array                             ...                             lock(fs_reclaim)     ...     evict      exfat_evict_inode       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock) To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 127 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases, a deadlock for sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.        CPU0                CPU1        ----                ----   kswapd    balance_pgdat     lock(fs_reclaim)                       exfat_iterate                        lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock)                        exfat_readdir                         exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry                          exfat_get_dentry_set                           __exfat_get_dentry_set                            kmalloc_array                             ...                             lock(fs_reclaim)     ...     evict      exfat_evict_inode       lock(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_lock) To fix this, let&amp;#39;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1875 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1875</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder unbekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder unbekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
