<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-01436</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01436</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-01436</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01436</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-42245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0779 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0779</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0779</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0779</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313086</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313086</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313086</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313086</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-42245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if
all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was
to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list
of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of
creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully
iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load
balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it
is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with
a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep
the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of
tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing
list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems
likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if
all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was
to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list
of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of
creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully
iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load
balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it
is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with
a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep
the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of
tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing
list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems
likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-762p-xx25-g6mq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-762p-xx25-g6mq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if
all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was
to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list
of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of
creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully
iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load
balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it
is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with
a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep
the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of
tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing
list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems
likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if
all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was
to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list
of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of
creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully
iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load
balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it
is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with
a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep
the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of
tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing
list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems
likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-762p-xx25-g6mq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-42245 — Revert "sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task"</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-42245</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-42245</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-42245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2802 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2802</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev-&amp;amp;gt;rx_q. It should be
validated header size, payload size and total packet size before
processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be
silently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ti: icssg_prueth: Fix NULL pointer dereference in prueth_probe()In the prueth_probe() function, if one of the calls to emac_phy_connect()fails due to of_phy_connect() returning NULL, then the subsequent call tophy_attached_info() will dereference a NULL pointer.Check the return code of emac_phy_connect and fail cleanly if there is anerror.(CVE-2024-38584)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cpufreq: exit() callback is optionalThe exit() callback is optional and shouldn t be called without checkinga valid pointer first.Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn tpresent.(CVE-2024-38615)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removalThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal ofthe driver. However, code doesn t update the respective globalvariable and after insmod — r…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev-&amp;amp;gt;rx_q. It should be
validated header size, payload size and total packet size before
processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be
silently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ti: icssg_prueth: Fix NULL pointer dereference in prueth_probe()In the prueth_probe() function, if one of the calls to emac_phy_connect()fails due to of_phy_connect() returning NULL, then the subsequent call tophy_attached_info() will dereference a NULL pointer.Check the return code of emac_phy_connect and fail cleanly if there is anerror.(CVE-2024-38584)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cpufreq: exit() callback is optionalThe exit() callback is optional and shouldn t be called without checkinga valid pointer first.Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn tpresent.(CVE-2024-38615)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removalThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal ofthe driver. However, code doesn t update the respective globalvariable and after insmod — r…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2802</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2024:9315 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2024:9315</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: use after free in i2c kernel: bluetooth: BR/EDR Bluetooth Impersonation Attacks (BIAS) kernel: hwmon: (lm90) Prevent integer overflow/underflow in hysteresis calculations kernel: asix: fix uninit-value in asix_mdio_read() kernel: tty: tty_buffer: Fix the softlockup issue in flush_to_ldisc kernel: hwmon: (w83793) Fix NULL pointer dereference by removing unnecessary structure field kernel: hwmon: (w83791d) Fix NULL pointer dereference by removing unnecessary structure field kernel: powerpc/64s: fix program check interrupt emergency stack path kernel: powerpc/64s: Fix unrecoverable MCE calling async handler from NMI kernel: lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don&amp;#39;t overflow in peek() kernel: powerpc/smp: do not decrement idle task preempt count in CPU offline kernel: can: isotp: isotp_sendmsg(): add result check for wait_event_interruptible() kernel: usbnet: sanity check for maxpacket kernel: nvmem: Fix shift-out-of-bound (UBSAN) with byte size cells kernel: aio: fix use-after-free due to missing POLLFREE handling kernel: powerpc/pseries: Fix potential memleak in papr_get_attr() kernel: of: fdt: fix off-by-one error in unflatten_dt_nodes() kernel: thermal/int340x_thermal: handle data_vault when the value is ZERO_SIZE_PTR kernel: vt_ioctl: fix array_index_nospec in vt_setactivate kernel: bpf: Fix crash due to out of bounds access into reg2btf_ids. kernel: lz4: fix LZ4_decompress_safe_partial read out of bound kernel: x86/mce: Work around an erratum on fast string copy instructions…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: use after free in i2c kernel: bluetooth: BR/EDR Bluetooth Impersonation Attacks (BIAS) kernel: hwmon: (lm90) Prevent integer overflow/underflow in hysteresis calculations kernel: asix: fix uninit-value in asix_mdio_read() kernel: tty: tty_buffer: Fix the softlockup issue in flush_to_ldisc kernel: hwmon: (w83793) Fix NULL pointer dereference by removing unnecessary structure field kernel: hwmon: (w83791d) Fix NULL pointer dereference by removing unnecessary structure field kernel: powerpc/64s: fix program check interrupt emergency stack path kernel: powerpc/64s: Fix unrecoverable MCE calling async handler from NMI kernel: lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don&amp;#39;t overflow in peek() kernel: powerpc/smp: do not decrement idle task preempt count in CPU offline kernel: can: isotp: isotp_sendmsg(): add result check for wait_event_interruptible() kernel: usbnet: sanity check for maxpacket kernel: nvmem: Fix shift-out-of-bound (UBSAN) with byte size cells kernel: aio: fix use-after-free due to missing POLLFREE handling kernel: powerpc/pseries: Fix potential memleak in papr_get_attr() kernel: of: fdt: fix off-by-one error in unflatten_dt_nodes() kernel: thermal/int340x_thermal: handle data_vault when the value is ZERO_SIZE_PTR kernel: vt_ioctl: fix array_index_nospec in vt_setactivate kernel: bpf: Fix crash due to out of bounds access into reg2btf_ids. kernel: lz4: fix LZ4_decompress_safe_partial read out of bound kernel: x86/mce: Work around an erratum on fast string copy instructions…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2024:9315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3194-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3194-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3194-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-42245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 89 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34; This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06. b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu. When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 89 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert &amp;#34;sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task&amp;#34; This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06. b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu. When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1788 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1788</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
