<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 12:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2024-08686</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-08686</link>
      <description>bdu:2024-08686</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-08686</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-42234</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42234</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42234</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0957 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0957</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0957</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0957</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-345980</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345980</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-345980</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345980</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-42234</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42234</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on
flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been
set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from
deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN
symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large
folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in
85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;),
but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own
local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time
folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing
to secure the folio and the list it is on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so
folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable()
while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding
such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and
unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing
was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on
flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been
set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from
deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN
symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large
folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in
85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;),
but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own
local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time
folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing
to secure the folio and the list it is on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so
folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable()
while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding
such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and
unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing
was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42234</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6p6f-gc59-4w3f</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6p6f-gc59-4w3f</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on
flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been
set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from
deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN
symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large
folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in
85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;),
but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own
local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time
folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing
to secure the folio and the list it is on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so
folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable()
while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding
such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and
unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing
was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on
flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been
set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from
deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN
symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large
folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in
85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;),
but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own
local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time
folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing
to secure the folio and the list it is on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so
folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable()
while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding
such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and
unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing
was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6p6f-gc59-4w3f</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2124 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2124</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated&#13;
&#13;
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from
userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don&amp;amp;apos;t
ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to
OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul
instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting&#13;
&#13;
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):&#13;
&#13;
 kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 ...
 RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
  e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt;
  0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
 ...
 Call Trace:
  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  &amp;amp;lt;…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated&#13;
&#13;
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from
userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don&amp;amp;apos;t
ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to
OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul
instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting&#13;
&#13;
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):&#13;
&#13;
 kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 ...
 RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
  e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt;
  0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
 ...
 Call Trace:
  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  &amp;amp;lt;…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2124</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-42234</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42234</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 88 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration. 6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in 85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;), but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing to secure the folio and the list it is on. Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable() while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 88 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration Even on 6.10-rc6, I&amp;#39;ve been seeing elusive &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s (often on flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from deferred_split_scan()&amp;#39;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration. 6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (&amp;#34;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large folio migration&amp;#34;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in 85ce2c517ade (&amp;#34;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration&amp;#34;), but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time folio-&amp;gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the &amp;#34;right&amp;#34; lock does nothing to secure the folio and the list it is on. Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable() while the old folio&amp;#39;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42234</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1788 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1788</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
