<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-02977</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02977</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-02977</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02977</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-42149</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42149</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42149</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0957 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0957</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0957</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0957</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313062</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313062</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313062</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313062</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-42149</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42149</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a
filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that
frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for
that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The
mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an
elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return
NULL in that case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before
the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is
required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is
already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t
ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become
ready.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as
dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and
get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a
filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that
frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for
that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The
mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an
elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return
NULL in that case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before
the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is
required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is
already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t
ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become
ready.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as
dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and
get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42149</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-xggq-vrr8-pfwp</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xggq-vrr8-pfwp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a
filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that
frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for
that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The
mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an
elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return
NULL in that case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before
the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is
required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is
already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t
ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become
ready.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as
dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and
get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a
filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that
frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for
that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The
mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an
elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return
NULL in that case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before
the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is
required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks
bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is
already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t
ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become
ready.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as
dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and
get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xggq-vrr8-pfwp</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-42149</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42149</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 88 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return NULL in that case. For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is required. Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting. In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw(). P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become ready. P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 88 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: don&amp;#39;t misleadingly warn during thaw operations The block device may have been frozen before it was claimed by a filesystem. Concurrently another process might try to mount that frozen block device and has temporarily claimed the block device for that purpose causing a concurrent fs_bdev_thaw() to end up here. The mounter is already about to abort mounting because they still saw an elevanted bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count so get_bdev_super() will return NULL in that case. For example, P1 calls dm_suspend() which calls into bdev_freeze() before the block device has been claimed by the filesystem. This brings bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count to 1 and no call into fs_bdev_freeze() is required. Now P2 tries to mount that frozen block device. It claims it and checks bdev-&amp;gt;bd_fsfreeze_count. As it&amp;#39;s elevated it aborts mounting. In the meantime P3 called dm_resume(). P3 sees that the block device is already claimed by a filesystem and calls into fs_bdev_thaw(). P3 takes a passive reference and realizes that the filesystem isn&amp;#39;t ready yet. P3 puts itself to sleep to wait for the filesystem to become ready. P2 now puts the last active reference to the filesystem and marks it as dying. P3 gets woken, sees that the filesystem is dying and get_bdev_super() fails.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42149</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1722 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
