https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 19:07:21 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01048 bdu:2025-01048 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01048 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-40974 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-40974 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0613 certfr-2024-avi-0613 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0613 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345889 EUVD-2026-345889 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345889 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-40974 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size</p> <p>plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea.</p> <p>For example, if I write a bug like this:</p> <p>long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);</p> <p>This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.)</p> <p>To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this:</p> <p>error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~</p> <p>[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size</p> <p>plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea.</p> <p>For example, if I write a bug like this:</p> <p>long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);</p> <p>This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.)</p> <p>To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this:</p> <p>error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~</p> <p>[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-40974 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gv48-p56m-p3qj <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size</p> <p>plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea.</p> <p>For example, if I write a bug like this:</p> <p>long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);</p> <p>This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.)</p> <p>To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this:</p> <p>error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~</p> <p>[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size</p> <p>plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea.</p> <p>For example, if I write a bug like this:</p> <p>long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);</p> <p>This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.)</p> <p>To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this:</p> <p>error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~</p> <p>[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gv48-p56m-p3qj https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07 <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1894 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es): In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don&amp;apos;t overflow in peek() When we started spreading new inode numbers throughout most of the 64 bit inode space, that triggered some corner case bugs, in particular some integer overflows related to the radix tree code. Oops.(CVE-2021-47432) In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler The following deadlock has been observed on a test setup: - All tags allocated - The SCSI error handler calls ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() - ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() queues work that calls ufshcd_err_handler() - ufshcd_err_handler() locks up as follows: Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler.cfi_jt Call trace: __switch_to+0x298/0x5d8 __schedule+0x6cc/0xa94 schedule+0x12c/0x298 blk_mq_get_tag+0x210/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_request+0x1c8/0x284 blk_get_request+0x74/0x134 ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x68/0x640 ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x68/0x35c ufshcd_probe_hba+0x12c/0x1cb8 ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x88/0x254 ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0xd0/0x354 ufshcd_err_handler+0x408/0xc58 process_one_work+0x24c/0x66c worker_thread+0x3e8/0xa4c kthread+0x150/0x1b4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 Fix this lockup by making ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() allocate a reserved request.(CVE-2021-47622) In the Linux kernel, the following…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es): In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don&amp;apos;t overflow in peek() When we started spreading new inode numbers throughout most of the 64 bit inode space, that triggered some corner case bugs, in particular some integer overflows related to the radix tree code. Oops.(CVE-2021-47432) In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler The following deadlock has been observed on a test setup: - All tags allocated - The SCSI error handler calls ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() - ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() queues work that calls ufshcd_err_handler() - ufshcd_err_handler() locks up as follows: Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler.cfi_jt Call trace: __switch_to+0x298/0x5d8 __schedule+0x6cc/0xa94 schedule+0x12c/0x298 blk_mq_get_tag+0x210/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_request+0x1c8/0x284 blk_get_request+0x74/0x134 ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x68/0x640 ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x68/0x35c ufshcd_probe_hba+0x12c/0x1cb8 ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x88/0x254 ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0xd0/0x354 ufshcd_err_handler+0x408/0xc58 process_one_work+0x24c/0x66c worker_thread+0x3e8/0xa4c kthread+0x150/0x1b4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 Fix this lockup by making ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() allocate a reserved request.(CVE-2021-47622) In the Linux kernel, the following…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1894 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2024:5101 <p>kernel: tracing: Restructure trace_clock_global() to never block kernel: ensure definition of the fixmap area is in a limit kernel: net: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr kernel: isdn: mISDN: netjet: Fix crash in nj_probe kernel: tcp: fix tcp_init_transfer() to not reset icsk_ca_initialized kernel: irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix potential VPE leak on error kernel: netfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups kernel: userfaultfd: fix a race between writeprotect and exit_mmap() kernel: isdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context kernel: mm: khugepaged: skip huge page collapse for special files kernel: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() kernel: ovl: fix warning in ovl_create_real() kernel: net/sunrpc: fix reference count leaks in rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_change kernel: i2c: mlxbf: prevent stack overflow in mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction() kernel: net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow kernel: block: Fix wrong offset in bio_truncate() kernel: net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype kernel: cifs: Fix memory leak when build ntlmssp negotiate blob failed kernel: x86/xen: Fix memory leak in xen_smp_intr_init{_pv}() kernel: Local information disclosure on Intel(R) Atom(R) processors kernel: powerpc: Fix access beyond end of drmem array kernel: efivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is not supported kernel: use-after-free in kv_parse_power_table kernel: null po…</p> <p>kernel: tracing: Restructure trace_clock_global() to never block kernel: ensure definition of the fixmap area is in a limit kernel: net: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr kernel: isdn: mISDN: netjet: Fix crash in nj_probe kernel: tcp: fix tcp_init_transfer() to not reset icsk_ca_initialized kernel: irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix potential VPE leak on error kernel: netfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups kernel: userfaultfd: fix a race between writeprotect and exit_mmap() kernel: isdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context kernel: mm: khugepaged: skip huge page collapse for special files kernel: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() kernel: ovl: fix warning in ovl_create_real() kernel: net/sunrpc: fix reference count leaks in rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_change kernel: i2c: mlxbf: prevent stack overflow in mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction() kernel: net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow kernel: block: Fix wrong offset in bio_truncate() kernel: net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype kernel: cifs: Fix memory leak when build ntlmssp negotiate blob failed kernel: x86/xen: Fix memory leak in xen_smp_intr_init{_pv}() kernel: Local information disclosure on Intel(R) Atom(R) processors kernel: powerpc: Fix access beyond end of drmem array kernel: efivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is not supported kernel: use-after-free in kv_parse_power_table kernel: null po…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2024:5101 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557 <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-40974 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 185 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea. For example, if I write a bug like this: long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...); This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.) To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this: error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~ [1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 185 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea. For example, if I write a bug like this: long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...); This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.) To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this: error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~ [1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 (&#34;gcc: disable &#39;-Warray-bounds&#39; for gcc-13 too&#34;) and related changes.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-40974 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1607 <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.</p> <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1607