<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2024-11544</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-11544</link>
      <description>bdu:2024-11544</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-11544</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-38610</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-38610</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-38610</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0610 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0610</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0610</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0610</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-345828</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345828</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-345828</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345828</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-38610</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-38610</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It
compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from
acrn folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding
more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test
on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous
follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for
pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for
ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is
dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area.
Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is
actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked
either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It
compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from
acrn folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding
more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test
on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous
follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for
pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for
ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is
dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area.
Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is
actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked
either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-38610</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-h3h3-jq7c-xgpc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-h3h3-jq7c-xgpc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It
compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from
acrn folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding
more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test
on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous
follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for
pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for
ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is
dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area.
Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is
actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked
either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It
compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from
acrn folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding
more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test
on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous
follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for
pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for
ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is
dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area.
Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is
actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked
either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-h3h3-jq7c-xgpc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-1836 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1836</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def&#13;
&#13;
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.&#13;
&#13;
The following log reveals it:&#13;
&#13;
[   29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414
[   29.612820] Call Trace:
[   29.613030]  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
[   29.613201]  dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[   29.613496]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.613754]  print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7
[   29.614082]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.614340]  kasan_report+0x8a/0x190
[   29.614628]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.614888]  kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0
[   29.615213]  memcpy+0x20/0x60
[   29.615454]  kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.615700]  lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310
[   29.616339]  i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline&#13;
&#13;
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of
interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is
deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the
original CPU.&#13;
&#13;
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is
enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,
but the old vector o…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def&#13;
&#13;
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.&#13;
&#13;
The following log reveals it:&#13;
&#13;
[   29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414
[   29.612820] Call Trace:
[   29.613030]  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
[   29.613201]  dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[   29.613496]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.613754]  print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7
[   29.614082]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.614340]  kasan_report+0x8a/0x190
[   29.614628]  ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.614888]  kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0
[   29.615213]  memcpy+0x20/0x60
[   29.615454]  kmemdup+0x30/0x40
[   29.615700]  lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310
[   29.616339]  i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline&#13;
&#13;
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of
interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is
deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the
original CPU.&#13;
&#13;
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is
enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,
but the old vector o…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1836</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:2571-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2571-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2571-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-38610</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-38610</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 129 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map() Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;. Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from acrn folks. Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte(). This patch (of 3): We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage. (1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions. Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now. (2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages. As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them. (3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range. We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area. Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 129 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map() Patch series &amp;#34;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes&amp;#34;. Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver.  It compiles, that&amp;#39;s all I know.  I&amp;#39;ll appreciate some review and testing from acrn folks. Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding more sanity checks, and improving the documentation.  Gave it a quick test on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte(). This patch (of 3): We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage. (1) We&amp;#39;re not checking PTE write permissions. Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let&amp;#39;s check for ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now. (2) We&amp;#39;re not rejecting refcounted pages. As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let&amp;#39;s make sure to reject them. (3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range. We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-&amp;gt;len may span a larger area. Let&amp;#39;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn&amp;#39;t have worked either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-38610</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1418 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1418</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
