<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 05:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-13349</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-13349</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-13349</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-13349</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-35803</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-35803</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-35803</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0526 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent une élé…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0526</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0526</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0526</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-312742</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312742</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-312742</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312742</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-35803</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-35803</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack
that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec,
this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but
all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same
stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls
the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit
entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation
of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in
64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using
the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any
stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot
stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will
corrupt the end of the .data section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of
the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode
systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So instead, record the firmware s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack
that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec,
this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but
all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same
stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls
the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit
entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation
of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in
64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using
the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any
stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot
stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will
corrupt the end of the .data section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of
the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode
systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So instead, record the firmware s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-35803</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-w77r-vc72-rx49</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-w77r-vc72-rx49</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack
that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec,
this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but
all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same
stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls
the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit
entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation
of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in
64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using
the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any
stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot
stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will
corrupt the end of the .data section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of
the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode
systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So instead, record the firmware s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack
that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec,
this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but
all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same
stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls
the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit
entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation
of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in
64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using
the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any
stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot
stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will
corrupt the end of the .data section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of
the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode
systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So instead, record the firmware s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-w77r-vc72-rx49</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-35803 — x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware's stack</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-35803</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-35803</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-35803</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:2135-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2135-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2135-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-35803</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-35803</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 173 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec, this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice. In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in 64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack. Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit   5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;) moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will corrupt the end of the .data section. While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base. So instead, record the firmware stack poi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 173 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/efistub: Call mixed mode boot services on the firmware&amp;#39;s stack Normally, the EFI stub calls into the EFI boot services using the stack that was live when the stub was entered. According to the UEFI spec, this stack needs to be at least 128k in size - this might seem large but all asynchronous processing and event handling in EFI runs from the same stack and so quite a lot of space may be used in practice. In mixed mode, the situation is a bit different: the bootloader calls the 32-bit EFI stub entry point, which calls the decompressor&amp;#39;s 32-bit entry point, where the boot stack is set up, using a fixed allocation of 16k. This stack is still in use when the EFI stub is started in 64-bit mode, and so all calls back into the EFI firmware will be using the decompressor&amp;#39;s limited boot stack. Due to the placement of the boot stack right after the boot heap, any stack overruns have gone unnoticed. However, commit   5c4feadb0011983b (&amp;#34;x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code&amp;#34;) moved the definition of the boot heap into C code, and now the boot stack is placed right at the base of BSS, where any overruns will corrupt the end of the .data section. While it would be possible to work around this by increasing the size of the boot stack, doing so would affect all x86 systems, and mixed mode systems are a tiny (and shrinking) fraction of the x86 installed base. So instead, record the firmware stack poi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-35803</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1188 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1188</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
