<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-4489</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-4489</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-4489</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-4489</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-28250</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-28250</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node&amp;#39;s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node&amp;#39;s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node&amp;#39;s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node&amp;#39;s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-28250</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6 — Unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cilium/cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node&amp;#39;s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node&amp;#39;s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* In native routing mode (`routingMode=native`):
  * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
  * Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
* In tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`):
  * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
  * Cilium v1.14.4 if `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` is set to `false` (default).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue has been resolved in:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* In native routing mode (`routingMode=native`):
  * Cilium v1.14.8
  * Cilium v1.15.2
* In tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`):
  * Cilium v1.14.4. **NOTE** `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`.
   
### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no workaround to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on [Slack](https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/community/community/#slack).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cilium/cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node&amp;#39;s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node&amp;#39;s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* In native routing mode (`routingMode=native`):
  * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
  * Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
* In tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`):
  * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
  * Cilium v1.14.4 if `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` is set to `false` (default).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue has been resolved in:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* In native routing mode (`routingMode=native`):
  * Cilium v1.14.8
  * Cilium v1.15.2
* In tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`):
  * Cilium v1.14.4. **NOTE** `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`.
   
### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no workaround to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on [Slack](https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/community/community/#slack).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2024-28250</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-28250</link>
      <description>gsd-2024-28250</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-28250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
