<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0420 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0420</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0420</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0420</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-26972</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-26972</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-26972</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vwrr-j6j5-7xgm</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vwrr-j6j5-7xgm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubifs: ubifs_symlink: Fix memleak of inode-&amp;gt;i_link in error path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For error handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as
bad first, then iput() is invoked. If inode-&amp;gt;i_link is initialized by
fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode-&amp;gt;i_link won&amp;#39;t
be freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -&amp;gt; fscrypt_free_inode in error
handling path, because make_bad_inode() has changed &amp;#39;inode-&amp;gt;i_mode&amp;#39; as
&amp;#39;S_IFREG&amp;#39;.
Following kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in
ubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario:
 unreferenced object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8):
  comm &amp;#34;ln&amp;#34;, pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701 (age 12.045s)
  backtrace:
   kmemdup+0x32/0x70
   __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0
   ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs]
   vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360
   do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0
There are two ways fixing it:
 1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling path. We can do that
    because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for good
    symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode-&amp;gt;i_nlink checking
    is before is_bad_inode().
 2. Free inode-&amp;gt;i_link before marking inode bad.
Method 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubifs: ubifs_symlink: Fix memleak of inode-&amp;gt;i_link in error path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For error handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as
bad first, then iput() is invoked. If inode-&amp;gt;i_link is initialized by
fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode-&amp;gt;i_link won&amp;#39;t
be freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -&amp;gt; fscrypt_free_inode in error
handling path, because make_bad_inode() has changed &amp;#39;inode-&amp;gt;i_mode&amp;#39; as
&amp;#39;S_IFREG&amp;#39;.
Following kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in
ubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario:
 unreferenced object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8):
  comm &amp;#34;ln&amp;#34;, pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701 (age 12.045s)
  backtrace:
   kmemdup+0x32/0x70
   __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0
   ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs]
   vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360
   do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0
There are two ways fixing it:
 1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling path. We can do that
    because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for good
    symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode-&amp;gt;i_nlink checking
    is before is_bad_inode().
 2. Free inode-&amp;gt;i_link before marking inode bad.
Method 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vwrr-j6j5-7xgm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2024-26972</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-26972</link>
      <description>gsd-2024-26972</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-26972</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-1679 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1679</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node&#13;
&#13;
Add check for the return value of of_find_device_by_node() and return
the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52650)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
pstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()&#13;
&#13;
In persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return
64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which
is derived from the 64-bit *unsigned long*, while the ecc_blocks variable
this value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) *int* type.  Even if that
value fits into *int* type, an overflow is still possible when calculating
the size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there&amp;amp;apos;s no cast to
any 64-bit type before multiplication.  Declaring the ecc_blocks variable
as *size_t* should fix this mess...&#13;
&#13;
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.(CVE-2023-52685)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/bridge: tpd12s015: Drop buggy __exit annotation for remove function&#13;
&#13;
With tpd12s015_remove() marked with __exit this function is discarded
when the driver is compiled as a built-in. The result is that when the
driver unbinds there is no cl…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node&#13;
&#13;
Add check for the return value of of_find_device_by_node() and return
the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52650)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
pstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()&#13;
&#13;
In persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return
64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which
is derived from the 64-bit *unsigned long*, while the ecc_blocks variable
this value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) *int* type.  Even if that
value fits into *int* type, an overflow is still possible when calculating
the size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there&amp;amp;apos;s no cast to
any 64-bit type before multiplication.  Declaring the ecc_blocks variable
as *size_t* should fix this mess...&#13;
&#13;
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.(CVE-2023-52685)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/bridge: tpd12s015: Drop buggy __exit annotation for remove function&#13;
&#13;
With tpd12s015_remove() marked with __exit this function is discarded
when the driver is compiled as a built-in. The result is that when the
driver unbinds there is no cl…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1679</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:1644-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:1644-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:1644-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-26972</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-26972</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 124 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 124 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-26972</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1008 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1008</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder sonstige Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder sonstige Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
