<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2023-54002</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-54002</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-54002</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0316 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0316</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0316</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0316</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-312310</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312310</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-312310</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312310</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2023-54002</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-54002</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device
add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid
states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two
more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads
racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when
the commands are started from command line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in
btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
  fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,
  in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310
   ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
   ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
   btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
   ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
   do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thr…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device
add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid
states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two
more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads
racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when
the commands are started from command line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in
btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
  fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,
  in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310
   ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
   ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
   btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
   ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
   do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thr…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-54002</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-m54r-3p53-fcch</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m54r-3p53-fcch</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device
add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid
states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two
more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads
racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when
the commands are started from command line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in
btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
  fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,
  in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310
   ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
   ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
   btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
   ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
   do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thr…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device
add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid
states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two
more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads
racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when
the commands are started from command line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in
btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
  fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,
  in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310
   ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
   ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
   btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
   ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
   do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thr…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m54r-3p53-fcch</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2023-54002</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-54002</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 171 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when the commands are started from command line. Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:   fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||   fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,   in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456   Call Trace:    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;    btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310    ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0    ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20    btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320    btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0    ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210    do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thread exe…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 171 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads racing to start balance and device add. This won&amp;#39;t typically happen when the commands are started from command line. Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:   fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||   fs_info-&amp;gt;exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,   in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456   Call Trace:    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;    btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310    ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0    ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20    btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320    btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0    ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210    do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thread exe…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-54002</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2920 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2920</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
