<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 07:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-10419</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10419</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-10419</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10419</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2023-53760</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53760</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53760</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-312245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312245</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-312245</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2023-53760</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53760</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53760</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6mjv-x284-3fg6</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6mjv-x284-3fg6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6mjv-x284-3fg6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2023:6583 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:6583</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block Kernel: race when faulting a device private page in memory manager kernel: use-after-free in l1oip timer handlers kernel: Rate limit overflow messages in r8152 in intr_callback kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_cmd_res_check kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_execbuf_tie_context hw: Intel: Gather Data Sampling (GDS) side channel vulnerability kernel: Information leak in l2cap_parse_conf_req in net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c kernel: perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF kernel: gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev() kernel: memcg: fix possible use-after-free in memcg_write_event_control() kernel: mm/khugepaged: invoke MMU notifiers in shmem/file collapse paths kernel: char: tpm: Protect tpm_pm_suspend with locks kernel: ixgbevf: Fix resource leak in ixgbevf_init_module() kernel: dax: make sure inodes are flushed before destroy cache kernel: watch_queue: Actually free the watch kernel: watch_queue: Fix NULL dereference in error cleanup kernel: rtc: pl031: fix rtc features null pointer dereference kernel: tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip kernel: NFSv4: Don&amp;#39;t hold the layoutget locks across multiple RPC calls kernel: xprtrdma: treat all calls not a bcall when bc_serv is NULL kernel: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() kernel: af_unix: Fix a data-race in unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(). kernel: regulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe kernel: mm/mempolicy: fix uninit-v…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block Kernel: race when faulting a device private page in memory manager kernel: use-after-free in l1oip timer handlers kernel: Rate limit overflow messages in r8152 in intr_callback kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_cmd_res_check kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_execbuf_tie_context hw: Intel: Gather Data Sampling (GDS) side channel vulnerability kernel: Information leak in l2cap_parse_conf_req in net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c kernel: perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF kernel: gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev() kernel: memcg: fix possible use-after-free in memcg_write_event_control() kernel: mm/khugepaged: invoke MMU notifiers in shmem/file collapse paths kernel: char: tpm: Protect tpm_pm_suspend with locks kernel: ixgbevf: Fix resource leak in ixgbevf_init_module() kernel: dax: make sure inodes are flushed before destroy cache kernel: watch_queue: Actually free the watch kernel: watch_queue: Fix NULL dereference in error cleanup kernel: rtc: pl031: fix rtc features null pointer dereference kernel: tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip kernel: NFSv4: Don&amp;#39;t hold the layoutget locks across multiple RPC calls kernel: xprtrdma: treat all calls not a bcall when bc_serv is NULL kernel: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() kernel: af_unix: Fix a data-race in unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(). kernel: regulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe kernel: mm/mempolicy: fix uninit-v…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:6583</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2023-53760</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53760</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 79 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to resolve the deadlock issue. [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]-------------------------------- [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:   ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0 [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:   lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c   _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c   ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0   ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec   handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8   handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0   generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c   gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134   call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74   do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4   el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78 &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; Possible unsafe locking scenario:        CPU0        ----   lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;     lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);   *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260: [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]  stack backtrace: CPU:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 79 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to resolve the deadlock issue. [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]-------------------------------- [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:   ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0 [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:   lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c   _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c   ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0   ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec   handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8   handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0   generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c   gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134   call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74   do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4   el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78 &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; Possible unsafe locking scenario:        CPU0        ----   lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;     lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);   *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260: [name:lockdep&amp;amp;]  stack backtrace: CPU:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53760</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2756 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2756</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erlangen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erlangen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
