<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-01393</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01393</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-01393</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01393</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2023-53728</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53728</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53728</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1009 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1009</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-312232</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312232</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-312232</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-312232</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2023-53728</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53728</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the
cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by
one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the
starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out
lockless, which leads to the following problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1
posix_timer_add()
  start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
  lock(hash_lock);
  ...				   posix_timer_add()
  if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)
      			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
     sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break
never happens because the condition can never be true:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)
     break;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is
huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of
KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the
cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by
one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the
starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out
lockless, which leads to the following problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1
posix_timer_add()
  start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
  lock(hash_lock);
  ...				   posix_timer_add()
  if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)
      			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
     sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break
never happens because the condition can never be true:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)
     break;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is
huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of
KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53728</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-2cvf-73cf-jrw5</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-2cvf-73cf-jrw5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the
cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by
one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the
starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out
lockless, which leads to the following problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1
posix_timer_add()
  start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
  lock(hash_lock);
  ...				   posix_timer_add()
  if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)
      			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
     sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break
never happens because the condition can never be true:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)
     break;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is
huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of
KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the
cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by
one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the
starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out
lockless, which leads to the following problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1
posix_timer_add()
  start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
  lock(hash_lock);
  ...				   posix_timer_add()
  if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)
      			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;
     sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break
never happens because the condition can never be true:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)
     break;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is
huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of
KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-2cvf-73cf-jrw5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2553 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2553</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/tunnel: wait until all sk_user_data reader finish before releasing the sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device
during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is
released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in
later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got
NULL pointer dereference. e.g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757
   #1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d
   #2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48
   #3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b
   #4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb
   #5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542
   #6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62
      [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b]
      RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b  RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0  RFLAGS: 00010246
      RAX: 0000000000000008  RBX: ffff8aa000888000  RCX: 0000000000000000
      RDX: 000000000000000e  RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e  RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700
      RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e   R8: 0000000000700000   R9: 00000000000010ae
      R10: ffff8a9fcb748980  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff8a9fd1168700
      R13: ffff8aa000888000  R14: 00000000002a0000  R15: 00000000000010ae
      ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
   #7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/tunnel: wait until all sk_user_data reader finish before releasing the sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device
during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is
released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in
later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got
NULL pointer dereference. e.g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757
   #1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d
   #2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48
   #3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b
   #4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb
   #5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542
   #6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62
      [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b]
      RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b  RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0  RFLAGS: 00010246
      RAX: 0000000000000008  RBX: ffff8aa000888000  RCX: 0000000000000000
      RDX: 000000000000000e  RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e  RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700
      RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e   R8: 0000000000700000   R9: 00000000000010ae
      R10: ffff8a9fcb748980  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff8a9fd1168700
      R13: ffff8aa000888000  R14: 00000000002a0000  R15: 00000000000010ae
      ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
   #7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2553</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:21040-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2023-53728</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53728</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 169 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation. This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the starting point. But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out lockless, which leads to the following problem: CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1 posix_timer_add()   start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;   lock(hash_lock);   ...				   posix_timer_add()   if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)       			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;      sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0; So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break never happens because the condition can never be true:   if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)      break; While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness. Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 169 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation. This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the starting point. But that&amp;#39;s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out lockless, which leads to the following problem: CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1 posix_timer_add()   start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;   lock(hash_lock);   ...				   posix_timer_add()   if (++sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id &amp;lt; 0)       			             start = sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id;      sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id = 0; So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break never happens because the condition can never be true:   if (sig-&amp;gt;posix_timer_id == start)      break; While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness. Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53728</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2394 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2394</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
