<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-04433</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04433</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-04433</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04433</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2023-53557</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-53557</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1009 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1009</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-345247</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345247</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-345247</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345247</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2023-53557</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-53557</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4jf8-pxjc-f722</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jf8-pxjc-f722</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jf8-pxjc-f722</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:21040-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2023-53557</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 78 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:   general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \   0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI   ...   Call Trace:    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;    fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270    ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10    ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10    ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10    ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10    ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80    ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0    ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40    ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0    ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250    ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120    ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90    ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc    &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt; In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu. Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 78 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:   general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \   0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI   ...   Call Trace:    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;    fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270    ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10    ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10    ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10    ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10    ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80    ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0    ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40    ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0    ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250    ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120    ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90    ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc    &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt; In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu. Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-53557</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2194 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2194</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
