https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:26:23 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02534 bdu:2025-02534 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-02534 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-52887 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-52887 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0778 certfr-2024-avi-0778 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0778 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345091 EUVD-2026-345091 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345091 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-52887 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new</p> <p>This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().</p> <p>Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new</p> <p>This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().</p> <p>Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-52887 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6fw4-4fx8-78rj <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new</p> <p>This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().</p> <p>Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new</p> <p>This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().</p> <p>Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6fw4-4fx8-78rj https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07 <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1961 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es): In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: &amp;gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (&amp;quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to &amp;gt; the RPC read layers&amp;quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up &amp;gt; to server rsize of 0x1000. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size &amp;gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset &amp;gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server &amp;gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as &amp;gt; a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb-&amp;gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827) In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: can: j1939: enhanced error handlin…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es): In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: &amp;gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (&amp;quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to &amp;gt; the RPC read layers&amp;quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up &amp;gt; to server rsize of 0x1000. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size &amp;gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset &amp;gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server &amp;gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as &amp;gt; a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb-&amp;gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827) In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: can: j1939: enhanced error handlin…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1961 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557 <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> <p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables.</p> <p>The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3190-1 <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3190-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-52887 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 158 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts(). Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 158 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts(). Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 &amp; while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-52887 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722 <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p> <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722