<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-188096</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-188096</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-188096</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-188096</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2023-43635</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-43635</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique
value for each PCR entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to
encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should
be protected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism,
designed to protect said “vault”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that
SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being
checked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs.
This leads to several issues:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;• Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well
as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;• SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the
key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render
the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique
value for each PCR entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to
encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should
be protected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism,
designed to protect said “vault”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that
SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being
checked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs.
This leads to several issues:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;• Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well
as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;• SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the
key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render
the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-43635</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4jvr-vj2c-8q37 — EVE Seals Vault Key With SHA1 PCRs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jvr-vj2c-8q37</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/lf-edge/eve&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vault key is sealed using SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256 PCRs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus an attacker with physical access to an EVE-OS device can try to brute force creating a kernel or rootfs image which produces the same SHA1 PCR but with malicious content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fixed in 9.4.3-lts and 10.1.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/lf-edge/eve&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vault key is sealed using SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256 PCRs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus an attacker with physical access to an EVE-OS device can try to brute force creating a kernel or rootfs image which produces the same SHA1 PCR but with malicious content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fixed in 9.4.3-lts and 10.1.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jvr-vj2c-8q37</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2023-43635</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-43635</link>
      <description>gsd-2023-43635</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-43635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
