https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:08:12 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2023:7877 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:8: openssl, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-perl</p> <p>OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* openssl: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters (CVE-2023-3446) * OpenSSL: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value (CVE-2023-3817) * openssl: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow (CVE-2023-5678)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:8: openssl, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:8: openssl-perl</p> <p>OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* openssl: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters (CVE-2023-3446) * OpenSSL: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value (CVE-2023-3817) * openssl: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow (CVE-2023-5678)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2023:7877 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2023-04957 bdu:2023-04957 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2023-04957 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-3446 <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2023-avi-0571 certfr-2023-avi-0571 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2023-avi-0571 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-gk72927 <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: openssl</p> <p>Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the openssl package. Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer or NULL pointer dereference during MAC verification. See references for individual vulnerability details.</p> <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: openssl</p> <p>Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the openssl package. Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer or NULL pointer dereference during MAC verification. See references for individual vulnerability details.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-gk72927 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-233250 EUVD-2026-233250 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-233250 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-3446 <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.</p> <p>Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.</p> <p>The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length.</p> <p>However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large.</p> <p>An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.</p> <p>The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().</p> <p>Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option.</p> <p>The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected…</p> <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.</p> <p>Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.</p> <p>The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length.</p> <p>However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large.</p> <p>An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.</p> <p>The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().</p> <p>Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option.</p> <p>The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3p3x-vg38-6g9q <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.</p> <p>Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.</p> <p>The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length.</p> <p>However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large.</p> <p>An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.</p> <p>The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().</p> <p>Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option.</p> <p>The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected…</p> <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.</p> <p>Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.</p> <p>The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length.</p> <p>However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large.</p> <p>An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.</p> <p>The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().</p> <p>Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option.</p> <p>The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3p3x-vg38-6g9q https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-3446 gsd-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-23-166-11 <p>json-c through 0.14 has an integer overflow and out-of-bounds write via a large JSON file, as demonstrated by printbuf_memappend. A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. A vulnerability was found in the fs/inode.c:inode_init_owner() function logic of the LInux kernel that allows local users to create files for the XFS file-system with an unintended group ownership and with group execution and SGID permission bits set, in a scenario where a directory is SGID and belongs to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of this group. This can lead to excessive permissions granted in case when they should not. This vulnerability is similar to the previous CVE-2018-13405 and adds the missed fix for the XFS. When sending malicous data to kernel by ioctl cmd FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO,kernel will write memory out of bounds. In gc_data_segment in fs/f2fs/gc.c in the Linux kernel before 5.16.3, special files are not considered, leading to a move_data_page NULL pointer dereference. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. The existing KVM SEV API has a vulnerability that allows a non-root (host) user-level application to crash the host kernel by creating a confidential guest VM inst…</p> <p>json-c through 0.14 has an integer overflow and out-of-bounds write via a large JSON file, as demonstrated by printbuf_memappend. A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. A vulnerability was found in the fs/inode.c:inode_init_owner() function logic of the LInux kernel that allows local users to create files for the XFS file-system with an unintended group ownership and with group execution and SGID permission bits set, in a scenario where a directory is SGID and belongs to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of this group. This can lead to excessive permissions granted in case when they should not. This vulnerability is similar to the previous CVE-2018-13405 and adds the missed fix for the XFS. When sending malicous data to kernel by ioctl cmd FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO,kernel will write memory out of bounds. In gc_data_segment in fs/f2fs/gc.c in the Linux kernel before 5.16.3, special files are not considered, leading to a move_data_page NULL pointer dereference. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. The existing KVM SEV API has a vulnerability that allows a non-root (host) user-level application to crash the host kernel by creating a confidential guest VM inst…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-23-166-11 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2023-3446 msrc_CVE-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2023-1466 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: openssl, openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP3: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2: openssl</p> <p>OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. Security Fix(es): Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&amp;apos;p&amp;apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam an…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: openssl, openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP3: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1: openssl, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2: openssl</p> <p>OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. Security Fix(es): Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&amp;apos;p&amp;apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam an…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2023-1466 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:13064-1 <p>libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1u-5.1 on GA media</p> <p>libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1u-5.1 on GA media</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:13064-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:7622 <p>openssl: Denial of service by excessive resource usage in verifying X509 policy constraints openssl: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored openssl: Certificate policy check not enabled openssl: Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers openssl: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters OpenSSL: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value tomcat: Open Redirect vulnerability in FORM authentication</p> <p>openssl: Denial of service by excessive resource usage in verifying X509 policy constraints openssl: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored openssl: Certificate policy check not enabled openssl: Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers openssl: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters OpenSSL: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value tomcat: Open Redirect vulnerability in FORM authentication</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:7622 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2023:2961-1 <p>Security update for openssl-1_1</p> <p>Security update for openssl-1_1</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2023:2961-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-3446 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: openssl1.0, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: openssl and 9 more</p> <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: openssl1.0, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: openssl and 9 more</p> <p>Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus (&#39;p&#39; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the &#39;-check&#39; option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2023-3446 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2023-1833 <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.</p> <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2023-1833