<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0307 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0307</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-310536</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310536</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-310536</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310536</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-49406</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49406</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49406</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-x74c-mr6j-xgx9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x74c-mr6j-xgx9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x74c-mr6j-xgx9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:1176-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49406</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49406</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 69 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show() When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the device is removed: [  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario: [  760.703551] [  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1 [  760.703556]        ----                    ---- [  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385); [  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385); [  760.703587] [  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK *** Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 69 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show() When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the device is removed: [  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario: [  760.703551] [  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1 [  760.703556]        ----                    ---- [  760.703558]   lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385); [  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;amp;q-&amp;gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703579]   lock(kn-&amp;gt;active#385); [  760.703587] [  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK *** Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
