<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-02607</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02607</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-02607</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02607</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0252 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0252</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344714</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344714</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344714</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344714</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-49337</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49337</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set
before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of
lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it
will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock
is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock
resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to
user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should
be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink
fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN,
USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is
released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for
USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow
waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can
simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix
user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink
004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy
[  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]---------…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set
before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of
lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it
will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock
is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock
resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to
user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should
be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink
fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN,
USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is
released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for
USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow
waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can
simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix
user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink
004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy
[  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]---------…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-xw4w-p39h-frx8</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xw4w-p39h-frx8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set
before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of
lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it
will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock
is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock
resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to
user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should
be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink
fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN,
USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is
released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for
USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow
waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can
simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix
user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink
004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy
[  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]---------…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set
before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of
lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it
will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock
is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock
resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to
user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should
be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink
fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN,
USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is
released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for
USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag,
USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow
waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can
simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix
user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink
004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy
[  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]---------…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xw4w-p39h-frx8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1370 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1370</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath5k: fix OOB in ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bug was found during fuzzing. Stacktrace locates it in
ath5k_eeprom_convert_pcal_info_5111.
When none of the curve is selected in the loop, idx can go
up to AR5K_EEPROM_N_PD_CURVES. The line makes pd out of bound.
pd = &amp;amp;amp;chinfo[pier].pd_curves[idx];&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many OOB writes using pd later in the code. So I
added a sanity check for idx. Checks for other loops involving
AR5K_EEPROM_N_PD_CURVES are not needed as the loop index is not
used outside the loops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patch is NOT tested with real device.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is the fuzzing report&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
Write of size 1 at addr ffff8880174a4d60 by task modprobe/214&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU: 0 PID: 214 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.6.0 #1
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x76/0xa0
 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x16/0x200
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 __kasan_report.cold+0x37/0x7c
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 kasan_report+0xe/0x20
 ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0x20
 ? ath5k_eeprom_init_11a_pcal_freq+0xbc0/0xbc0 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_pci_eeprom_read+0x228/0x3c0 [ath5k]
 ath5k_eeprom_init+0x2513/0x6290 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath5k: fix OOB in ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bug was found during fuzzing. Stacktrace locates it in
ath5k_eeprom_convert_pcal_info_5111.
When none of the curve is selected in the loop, idx can go
up to AR5K_EEPROM_N_PD_CURVES. The line makes pd out of bound.
pd = &amp;amp;amp;chinfo[pier].pd_curves[idx];&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many OOB writes using pd later in the code. So I
added a sanity check for idx. Checks for other loops involving
AR5K_EEPROM_N_PD_CURVES are not needed as the loop index is not
used outside the loops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patch is NOT tested with real device.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is the fuzzing report&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
Write of size 1 at addr ffff8880174a4d60 by task modprobe/214&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU: 0 PID: 214 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.6.0 #1
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x76/0xa0
 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x16/0x200
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 __kasan_report.cold+0x37/0x7c
 ? ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 kasan_report+0xe/0x20
 ath5k_eeprom_read_pcal_info_5111+0x126a/0x1390 [ath5k]
 ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0x20
 ? ath5k_eeprom_init_11a_pcal_freq+0xbc0/0xbc0 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_pci_eeprom_read+0x228/0x3c0 [ath5k]
 ath5k_eeprom_init+0x2513/0x6290 [ath5k]
 ? ath5k_…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1370</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:1176-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49337</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49337</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux and 143 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink fail. For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this. [  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink 004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy [  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]------------…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux and 143 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn&amp;#39;t clean up the flags it set before exit.  For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to user-after-free.  See the following panic call trace.  To fix this, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail.  And also error should be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink fail. For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared.  Even though spin lock is released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails.  Fix user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this. [  941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink 004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy [  989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]------------…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2107 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2107</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
