<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-03821</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03821</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-03821</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03821</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1057 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1057</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1057</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1057</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-310311</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310311</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-310311</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310311</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-49049</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49049</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets
a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the
panic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fd = memfd_secret();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ftruncate(fd, 10);
    ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;munmap(ptr, 10);
    ftruncate(fd, 20);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down
into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually
we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this
via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to
memset()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the
direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every
fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and
when we try to memset() with it we panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for
memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for
the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try
to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will
require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal
fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend
memfd_secret to support growing in…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets
a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the
panic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fd = memfd_secret();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ftruncate(fd, 10);
    ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;munmap(ptr, 10);
    ftruncate(fd, 20);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down
into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually
we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this
via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to
memset()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the
direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every
fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and
when we try to memset() with it we panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for
memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for
the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try
to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will
require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal
fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend
memfd_secret to support growing in…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49049</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5265-p799-mv2x</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5265-p799-mv2x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets
a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the
panic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fd = memfd_secret();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ftruncate(fd, 10);
    ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;munmap(ptr, 10);
    ftruncate(fd, 20);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down
into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually
we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this
via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to
memset()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the
direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every
fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and
when we try to memset() with it we panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for
memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for
the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try
to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will
require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal
fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend
memfd_secret to support growing in…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets
a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the
panic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fd = memfd_secret();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ftruncate(fd, 10);
    ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;munmap(ptr, 10);
    ftruncate(fd, 20);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down
into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually
we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this
via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to
memset()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the
direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every
fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and
when we try to memset() with it we panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for
memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for
the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try
to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will
require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal
fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend
memfd_secret to support growing in…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5265-p799-mv2x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2023:2458 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hw: cpu: AMD CPUs may transiently execute beyond unconditional direct branch kernel: ext4: kernel bug in ext4_write_inline_data_end() kernel: malicious data for FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO ioctl may cause OOB write memory kernel: hwmon: (mlxreg-fan) Return non-zero value when fan current state is enforced from sysfs kernel: mlxsw: thermal: Fix out-of-bounds memory accesses kernel: mlxsw: spectrum: Protect driver from buggy firmware kernel: net: stmmac: fix tc flower deletion for VLAN priority Rx steering kernel: can: etas_es58x: es58x_rx_err_msg(): fix memory leak in error path kernel: possible race condition in drivers/tty/tty_buffers.c kernel: KVM: NULL pointer dereference in kvm_mmu_invpcid_gva kernel: use-after-free in free_pipe_info() could lead to privilege escalation kernel: KVM: nVMX: missing IBPB when exiting from nested guest can lead to Spectre v2 attacks kernel: netfilter: nf_conntrack_irc message handling issue kernel: race condition in xfrm_probe_algs can lead to OOB read/write kernel: out-of-bounds read in fib_nh_match of the file net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c kernel: race condition in hugetlb_no_page() in mm/hugetlb.c kernel: memory leak in ipv6_renew_options() kernel: data races around icsk-&amp;gt;icsk_af_ops in do_ipv6_setsockopt kernel: data races around sk-&amp;gt;sk_prot kernel: memory leak in l2cap_recv_acldata of the file net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c kernel: denial of service in follow_page_pte in mm/gup.c due to poisoned pte entry kernel: use-after-free after failed devlink relo…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;hw: cpu: AMD CPUs may transiently execute beyond unconditional direct branch kernel: ext4: kernel bug in ext4_write_inline_data_end() kernel: malicious data for FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO ioctl may cause OOB write memory kernel: hwmon: (mlxreg-fan) Return non-zero value when fan current state is enforced from sysfs kernel: mlxsw: thermal: Fix out-of-bounds memory accesses kernel: mlxsw: spectrum: Protect driver from buggy firmware kernel: net: stmmac: fix tc flower deletion for VLAN priority Rx steering kernel: can: etas_es58x: es58x_rx_err_msg(): fix memory leak in error path kernel: possible race condition in drivers/tty/tty_buffers.c kernel: KVM: NULL pointer dereference in kvm_mmu_invpcid_gva kernel: use-after-free in free_pipe_info() could lead to privilege escalation kernel: KVM: nVMX: missing IBPB when exiting from nested guest can lead to Spectre v2 attacks kernel: netfilter: nf_conntrack_irc message handling issue kernel: race condition in xfrm_probe_algs can lead to OOB read/write kernel: out-of-bounds read in fib_nh_match of the file net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c kernel: race condition in hugetlb_no_page() in mm/hugetlb.c kernel: memory leak in ipv6_renew_options() kernel: data races around icsk-&amp;gt;icsk_af_ops in do_ipv6_setsockopt kernel: data races around sk-&amp;gt;sk_prot kernel: memory leak in l2cap_recv_acldata of the file net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c kernel: denial of service in follow_page_pte in mm/gup.c due to poisoned pte entry kernel: use-after-free after failed devlink relo…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49049</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49049</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 139 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the panic:     fd = memfd_secret();     ftruncate(fd, 10);     ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);     strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);     munmap(ptr, 10);     ftruncate(fd, 20); The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to memset()). For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and when we try to memset() with it we panic. This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL. One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend memfd_secret to support growing in a separa…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 139 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets a panic [1].  For example, doing the following reliably induces the panic:     fd = memfd_secret();     ftruncate(fd, 10);     ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);     strcpy(ptr, &amp;#34;123456789&amp;#34;);     munmap(ptr, 10);     ftruncate(fd, 20); The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually we try to zero part of the memory.  The normal truncation code does this via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to memset()). For memfd_secret though, we specifically don&amp;#39;t map our pages via the direct map (i.e.  we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every fault).  So the address returned by page_address() isn&amp;#39;t useful, and when we try to memset() with it we panic. This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL. One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will require a significantly more lengthy change.  So, I propose a minimal fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend memfd_secret to support growing in a separa…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
