<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 03:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2024-06611</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-06611</link>
      <description>bdu:2024-06611</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-06611</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0693 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0693</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0693</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0693</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-310192</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310192</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-310192</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310192</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-48853</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-48853</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering
cve-2018-1000204.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short description of what happens follows:
1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO
   interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV
   and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR
   is not reading from the device.
2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively
   bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into
   it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in
   sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is
   allocated with GFP_ZERO.
3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the
   device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device
   and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function
   virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here
   scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing
   via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like
   s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV).
4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second
   (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some
   previous IO data…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering
cve-2018-1000204.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short description of what happens follows:
1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO
   interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV
   and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR
   is not reading from the device.
2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively
   bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into
   it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in
   sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is
   allocated with GFP_ZERO.
3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the
   device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device
   and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function
   virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here
   scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing
   via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like
   s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV).
4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second
   (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some
   previous IO data…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-48853</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-p622-mwq3-26f2</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p622-mwq3-26f2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering
cve-2018-1000204.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short description of what happens follows:
1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO
   interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV
   and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR
   is not reading from the device.
2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively
   bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into
   it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in
   sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is
   allocated with GFP_ZERO.
3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the
   device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device
   and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function
   virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here
   scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing
   via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like
   s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV).
4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second
   (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some
   previous IO data…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering
cve-2018-1000204.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short description of what happens follows:
1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO
   interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV
   and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR
   is not reading from the device.
2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively
   bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into
   it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in
   sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is
   allocated with GFP_ZERO.
3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the
   device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device
   and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function
   virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here
   scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing
   via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like
   s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV).
4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second
   (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some
   previous IO data…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p622-mwq3-26f2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:2894-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2894-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2894-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48853</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-48853</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux and 115 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204. A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO    interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV    and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR    is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively    bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into    it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in    sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is    allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the    device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a    DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device    and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function    virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here    scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing    via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like    s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second    (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some    previous IO data),…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux and 115 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE The problem I&amp;#39;m addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204. A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO    interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV    and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR    is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively    bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into    it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (&amp;#34;scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in    sg_build_indirect()&amp;#34;) we make sure this first bounce buffer is    allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the    device won&amp;#39;t touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a    DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device    and the  buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function    virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the &amp;#34;in&amp;#34; sgs (here    scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing    via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like    s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second    (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some    previous IO data),…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-48853</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1625 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1625</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
