<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 11:18:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2024-10016</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-10016</link>
      <description>bdu:2024-10016</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2024-10016</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0420 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0420</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0420</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0420</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-310068</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310068</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-310068</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310068</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-48644</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-48644</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets
called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since
commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;),
but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full
offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in
taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS
parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this
determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()
(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro
on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set
to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on
an invalid set of flags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an
error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling
of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the
offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,
but instead as child of a…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets
called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since
commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;),
but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full
offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in
taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS
parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this
determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()
(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro
on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set
to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on
an invalid set of flags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an
error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling
of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the
offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,
but instead as child of a…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-48644</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vr5f-5953-gfj5</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vr5f-5953-gfj5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets
called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since
commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;),
but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full
offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in
taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS
parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this
determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()
(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro
on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set
to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on
an invalid set of flags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an
error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling
of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the
offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,
but instead as child of a…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets
called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since
commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;),
but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full
offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in
taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS
parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this
determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()
(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro
on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set
to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on
an invalid set of flags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an
error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling
of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the
offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,
but instead as child of a…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vr5f-5953-gfj5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2022-48644</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-48644</link>
      <description>gsd-2022-48644</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-48644</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-2080 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2080</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
io_uring: fix memleak in io_init_wq_offload()&#13;
&#13;
I got memory leak report when doing fuzz test:&#13;
&#13;
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888107310a80 (size 96):
comm &amp;amp;quot;syz-executor.6&amp;amp;quot;, pid 4610, jiffies 4295140240 (age 20.135s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........
backtrace:
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] io_init_wq_offload fs/io_uring.c:7920 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x466/0x640 fs/io_uring.c:7955
[&amp;amp;lt;0000000039d0800d&amp;amp;gt;] __io_uring_add_tctx_node+0x256/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:9016
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] io_uring_add_tctx_node fs/io_uring.c:9052 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9354 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9301 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0xabc/0xc20 fs/io_uring.c:9301
[&amp;amp;lt;00000000b875f18f&amp;amp;gt;] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;00000000b875f18f&amp;amp;gt;] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
[&amp;amp;lt;000000006b0a8484&amp;amp;gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae&#13;
&#13;
CPU0…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
io_uring: fix memleak in io_init_wq_offload()&#13;
&#13;
I got memory leak report when doing fuzz test:&#13;
&#13;
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888107310a80 (size 96):
comm &amp;amp;quot;syz-executor.6&amp;amp;quot;, pid 4610, jiffies 4295140240 (age 20.135s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........
backtrace:
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] io_init_wq_offload fs/io_uring.c:7920 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000001974933b&amp;amp;gt;] io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x466/0x640 fs/io_uring.c:7955
[&amp;amp;lt;0000000039d0800d&amp;amp;gt;] __io_uring_add_tctx_node+0x256/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:9016
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] io_uring_add_tctx_node fs/io_uring.c:9052 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9354 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9301 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;000000008482e78c&amp;amp;gt;] __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0xabc/0xc20 fs/io_uring.c:9301
[&amp;amp;lt;00000000b875f18f&amp;amp;gt;] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
[&amp;amp;lt;00000000b875f18f&amp;amp;gt;] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
[&amp;amp;lt;000000006b0a8484&amp;amp;gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae&#13;
&#13;
CPU0…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2080</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:1644-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:1644-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:1644-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-48644</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-hwe-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-ibm-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-oracle-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-raspi-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;), but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()). The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()). But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags). But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() (a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on an invalid set of flags. As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the offload to be disabled when it was never enabled. The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc, but instead as child of an mqpri…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-hwe-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-ibm-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-oracle-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-raspi-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-&amp;gt;destroy() gets called even if qdisc-&amp;gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f (&amp;#34;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation&amp;#34;), but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()). The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full offload, because it starts off with q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in taprio_init(), then it replaces q-&amp;gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()). But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-&amp;gt;flags). But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() (a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-&amp;gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro on q-&amp;gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on an invalid set of flags. As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an error between setting q-&amp;gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the offload to be disabled when it was never enabled. The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc, but instead as child of an mqpri…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-48644</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-0984 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-0984</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann diese Schwachstellen ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann diese Schwachstellen ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-0984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
