<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-cosign-2022-23649 — Improper Certificate Validation in Cosign</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cosign-2022-23649</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don&amp;#39;t match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don&amp;#39;t match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cosign-2022-23649</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: CLEANSTART-2026-AC92865 — Security fixes in cosign 1.5.2-r0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-ac92865</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Package cosign version 1.5.2-r0 fixes 1 vulnerabilities: CVE-2022-23649&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Package cosign version 1.5.2-r0 fixes 1 vulnerabilities: CVE-2022-23649&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-ac92865</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2022-13373</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2022-13373</link>
      <description>cnvd-2022-13373</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2022-13373</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-234421</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-234421</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-234421</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-234421</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-23649</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-23649</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don&amp;#39;t match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don&amp;#39;t match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-23649</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-ccxc-vr6p-4858 — Improper Certificate Validation in Cosign</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ccxc-vr6p-4858</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/sigstore/cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Signing with a keypair&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;details&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this vulnerability, create a keypair and sign an image. Don&amp;#39;t store the signature in Rekor:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
$ cosign generate-key-pair       
$ cosign sign --key cosign.key IMAGE
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. To accomplish this, the attacker needs to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Pull the signature image
2. Annotate the signature image with any valid Rekor bundle under the `dev.sigstore.cosign/bundle` annotation
3. Push the signature image back to OCI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verification then prints out the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
$ cosign verify [--key]  [IMAGE]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verification for [IMAGE] --
The following checks were performed on each of these signatures:
  - The cosign claims were validated
  - Existence of the claims in the transparency log was verified offline
  - The signatures were verified against the specified public key
  - Any certificates were verified against the Fulcio roots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[…]
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The claim that `Existence of the claims in the transparency log was verified offline` is inaccurate since an entry for this image doesn&amp;#39;t exist in the log.
The claim…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/sigstore/cosign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn&amp;#39;t. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and &amp;#34;keyless signing&amp;#34; with Fulcio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Signing with a keypair&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;details&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this vulnerability, create a keypair and sign an image. Don&amp;#39;t store the signature in Rekor:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
$ cosign generate-key-pair       
$ cosign sign --key cosign.key IMAGE
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn&amp;#39;t. To accomplish this, the attacker needs to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Pull the signature image
2. Annotate the signature image with any valid Rekor bundle under the `dev.sigstore.cosign/bundle` annotation
3. Push the signature image back to OCI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verification then prints out the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
$ cosign verify [--key]  [IMAGE]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verification for [IMAGE] --
The following checks were performed on each of these signatures:
  - The cosign claims were validated
  - Existence of the claims in the transparency log was verified offline
  - The signatures were verified against the specified public key
  - Any certificates were verified against the Fulcio roots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[…]
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The claim that `Existence of the claims in the transparency log was verified offline` is inaccurate since an entry for this image doesn&amp;#39;t exist in the log.
The claim…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ccxc-vr6p-4858</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2022-23649</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-23649</link>
      <description>gsd-2022-23649</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-23649</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2024:11860-1 — cosign-1.5.2-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:11860-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;cosign-1.5.2-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;cosign-1.5.2-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:11860-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
