<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0145 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans &lt;span
class="textit"&gt;les produits IBM&lt;/span&gt;. Certaines d'entre el…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0145</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0145</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0145</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-216011</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-216011</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-216011</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-216011</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-23540</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-23540</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In versions `&amp;lt;=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need &amp;#39;none&amp;#39; algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In versions `&amp;lt;=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need &amp;#39;none&amp;#39; algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-23540</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-qwph-4952-7xr6 — jsonwebtoken vulnerable to signature validation bypass due to insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qwph-4952-7xr6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: jsonwebtoken&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Overview&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In versions &amp;lt;=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Am I affected?
You will be affected if all the following are true in the `jwt.verify()` function:
- a token with no signature is received
- no algorithms are specified 
- a falsy (e.g. null, false, undefined) secret or key is passed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# How do I fix it?
 
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Will the fix impact my users?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need &amp;#39;none&amp;#39; algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: jsonwebtoken&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Overview&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In versions &amp;lt;=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Am I affected?
You will be affected if all the following are true in the `jwt.verify()` function:
- a token with no signature is received
- no algorithms are specified 
- a falsy (e.g. null, false, undefined) secret or key is passed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# How do I fix it?
 
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Will the fix impact my users?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need &amp;#39;none&amp;#39; algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qwph-4952-7xr6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2022-23540</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-23540</link>
      <description>gsd-2022-23540</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-23540</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2023:3742 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.13.0 security and bug fix update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:3742</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;vault: Hashicorp Vault AWS IAM Integration Authentication Bypass vault: GCP Auth Method Allows Authentication Bypass validator: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Validator.js nodejs-ansi-regex: Regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) matching ANSI escape codes go-yaml: Denial of Service in go-yaml goutils: RandomAlphaNumeric and CryptoRandomAlphaNumeric are not as random as they should be vault: incorrect policy enforcement nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection nodejs: Incorrect handling of certificate subject and issuer fields golang: archive/tar: github.com/vbatts/tar-split: unbounded memory consumption when reading headers golang: net/http/httputil: ReverseProxy should not forward unparseable query parameters nodejs-minimatch: ReDoS via the braceExpand function nodejs: Prototype pollution via console.table properties jsonwebtoken: Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass jsonwebtoken: Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC golang: net/http: handle server errors after sending GOAWAY golang: encoding/gob: stack exhaustion in Decoder.Decode golang: math/big: decoding big.Float and big.Rat types can panic if the encoded message is too short, potentially allowing a denial of service golang: net/url: JoinPath does not strip relative path components in all circumstan…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;vault: Hashicorp Vault AWS IAM Integration Authentication Bypass vault: GCP Auth Method Allows Authentication Bypass validator: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Validator.js nodejs-ansi-regex: Regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) matching ANSI escape codes go-yaml: Denial of Service in go-yaml goutils: RandomAlphaNumeric and CryptoRandomAlphaNumeric are not as random as they should be vault: incorrect policy enforcement nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection nodejs: Incorrect handling of certificate subject and issuer fields golang: archive/tar: github.com/vbatts/tar-split: unbounded memory consumption when reading headers golang: net/http/httputil: ReverseProxy should not forward unparseable query parameters nodejs-minimatch: ReDoS via the braceExpand function nodejs: Prototype pollution via console.table properties jsonwebtoken: Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass jsonwebtoken: Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC golang: net/http: handle server errors after sending GOAWAY golang: encoding/gob: stack exhaustion in Decoder.Decode golang: math/big: decoding big.Float and big.Rat types can panic if the encoded message is too short, potentially allowing a denial of service golang: net/url: JoinPath does not strip relative path components in all circumstan…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2023:3742</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2023-0218 — IBM Integration Bus: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2023-0218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Integration Bus ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Integration Bus ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2023-0218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
