<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-00812</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-00812</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-00812</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-00812</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-0242 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans &lt;span
class="textit"&gt;le noyau Linux de SUSE&lt;/span&gt;. Certaines d'en…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0242</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-0242</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0242</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344351</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344351</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344351</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344351</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2021-46989</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-46989</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151
(&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the
first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from
extents overflow file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which
locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was
changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size
inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if
the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard
(blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has
unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed
unconditionally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and
then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so
that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This
causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of
truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the
start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full exten…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151
(&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the
first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from
extents overflow file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which
locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was
changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size
inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if
the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard
(blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has
unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed
unconditionally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and
then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so
that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This
causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of
truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the
start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full exten…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-46989</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-758g-j8h5-xvgg</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-758g-j8h5-xvgg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151
(&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the
first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from
extents overflow file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which
locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was
changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size
inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if
the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard
(blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has
unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed
unconditionally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and
then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so
that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This
causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of
truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the
start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full exten…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151
(&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the
first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from
extents overflow file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which
locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was
changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size
inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if
the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard
(blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has
unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed
unconditionally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and
then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so
that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This
causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of
truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the
start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full exten…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-758g-j8h5-xvgg</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2021-46989</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-46989</link>
      <description>gsd-2021-46989</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-46989</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2024-1392 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1392</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
media: dvbdev: Fix memory leak in dvb_media_device_free()&#13;
&#13;
dvb_media_device_free() is leaking memory. Free `dvbdev-&amp;amp;gt;adapter-&amp;amp;gt;conn`
before setting it to NULL, as documented in include/media/media-device.h:
&amp;amp;quot;The media_entity instance itself must be freed explicitly by the driver
if required.&amp;amp;quot;(CVE-2020-36777)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
i2c: sprd: fix reference leak when pm_runtime_get_sync fails&#13;
&#13;
The PM reference count is not expected to be incremented on
return in sprd_i2c_master_xfer() and sprd_i2c_remove().&#13;
&#13;
However, pm_runtime_get_sync will increment the PM reference
count even failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result
in a reference leak here.&#13;
&#13;
Replace it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.(CVE-2020-36780)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
i2c: cadence: fix reference leak when pm_runtime_get_sync fails&#13;
&#13;
The PM reference count is not expected to be incremented on
return in functions cdns_i2c_master_xfer and cdns_reg_slave.&#13;
&#13;
However, pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter
even failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
reference leak here.&#13;
&#13;
Replace it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.(CVE-2020-36784)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel,…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
media: dvbdev: Fix memory leak in dvb_media_device_free()&#13;
&#13;
dvb_media_device_free() is leaking memory. Free `dvbdev-&amp;amp;gt;adapter-&amp;amp;gt;conn`
before setting it to NULL, as documented in include/media/media-device.h:
&amp;amp;quot;The media_entity instance itself must be freed explicitly by the driver
if required.&amp;amp;quot;(CVE-2020-36777)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
i2c: sprd: fix reference leak when pm_runtime_get_sync fails&#13;
&#13;
The PM reference count is not expected to be incremented on
return in sprd_i2c_master_xfer() and sprd_i2c_remove().&#13;
&#13;
However, pm_runtime_get_sync will increment the PM reference
count even failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result
in a reference leak here.&#13;
&#13;
Replace it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.(CVE-2020-36780)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
i2c: cadence: fix reference leak when pm_runtime_get_sync fails&#13;
&#13;
The PM reference count is not expected to be incremented on
return in functions cdns_i2c_master_xfer and cdns_reg_slave.&#13;
&#13;
However, pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter
even failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
reference leak here.&#13;
&#13;
Replace it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.(CVE-2020-36784)&#13;
&#13;
In the Linux kernel,…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1392</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:0856-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:0856-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:0856-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2021-46989</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2021-46989</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-hwe-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-oracle-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-raspi-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure and 80 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151 (&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;) HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from extents overflow file. In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more. Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard (blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed unconditionally. To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data. Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full extent recor…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-hwe-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-oracle-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-raspi-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure and 80 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151 (&amp;#34;hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation&amp;#34;) HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents.  In case the first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from extents overflow file. In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more. Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if the whole extent record should be removed.  However since the guard (blk_cnt &amp;gt; start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed unconditionally. To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8.  This causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of truncating into middle of it.  Thus this causes corruption, and lost data. Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full extent recor…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2021-46989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
