<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-10810</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10810</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-10810</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10810</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: BELL-CVE-2021-36368 — CVE-2021-36368 does not affect BellSoft software</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2021-36368</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2021-36368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-322946</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322946</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-322946</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322946</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2021-36368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-36368</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but without -oLogLevel=verbose, and an attacker has silently modified the server to support the None authentication option, then the user cannot determine whether FIDO authentication is going to confirm that the user wishes to connect to that server, or that the user wishes to allow that server to connect to a different server on the user&amp;#39;s behalf. NOTE: the vendor&amp;#39;s position is &amp;#34;this is not an authentication bypass, since nothing is being bypassed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but without -oLogLevel=verbose, and an attacker has silently modified the server to support the None authentication option, then the user cannot determine whether FIDO authentication is going to confirm that the user wishes to connect to that server, or that the user wishes to allow that server to connect to a different server on the user&amp;#39;s behalf. NOTE: the vendor&amp;#39;s position is &amp;#34;this is not an authentication bypass, since nothing is being bypassed.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-36368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-542x-jxrc-hw4x</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-542x-jxrc-hw4x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but without -oLogLevel=verbose, and an attacker has silently modified the server to support the None authentication option, then the user cannot determine whether FIDO authentication is going to confirm that the user wishes to connect to that server, or that the user wishes to allow that server to connect to a different server on the user&amp;#39;s behalf. NOTE: the vendor&amp;#39;s position is &amp;#34;this is not an authentication bypass, since nothing is being bypassed.&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but without -oLogLevel=verbose, and an attacker has silently modified the server to support the None authentication option, then the user cannot determine whether FIDO authentication is going to confirm that the user wishes to connect to that server, or that the user wishes to allow that server to connect to a different server on the user&amp;#39;s behalf. NOTE: the vendor&amp;#39;s position is &amp;#34;this is not an authentication bypass, since nothing is being bypassed.&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-542x-jxrc-hw4x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2021-36368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-36368</link>
      <description>gsd-2021-36368</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-36368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2021-36368 — An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2021-36368</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2021-36368</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2021-36368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCA-2025-0009 — Vulnerabilities affecting SICK TDC-E210GC</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/sca-2025-0009</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The PKCS#11 feature in ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 9.3p2 has an insufficiently trustworthy search path, leading to remote code execution if an agent is forwarded to an attacker-controlled system. (Code in /usr/lib is not necessarily safe for loading into ssh-agent.) NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-10009. A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. The scp client in OpenSSH 8.2 incorrectly sends duplicate responses to the server upon a utimes system call failure, which allows a malicious unprivileged user on the remote server to overwrite arbitrary files in the client&amp;#39;s download directory by creating a crafted subdirectory anywhere on the remote server. The victim must use the command scp -rp to download a file hierarchy containing, anywhere inside, this crafted subdirectory. NOTE: the vendor points out that &amp;#34;this attack can achieve no more than a hostile peer is already able to achieve within the scp protocol&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;utimes does not fail under normal circumstances. An unauthorized access vulnerabiitly exists in all versions of Portainer, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information. NOTE: Portainer has received no detail of this CVE report. There is also no response after multiple attempts of contacting the original source. In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The PKCS#11 feature in ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 9.3p2 has an insufficiently trustworthy search path, leading to remote code execution if an agent is forwarded to an attacker-controlled system. (Code in /usr/lib is not necessarily safe for loading into ssh-agent.) NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-10009. A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. The scp client in OpenSSH 8.2 incorrectly sends duplicate responses to the server upon a utimes system call failure, which allows a malicious unprivileged user on the remote server to overwrite arbitrary files in the client&amp;#39;s download directory by creating a crafted subdirectory anywhere on the remote server. The victim must use the command scp -rp to download a file hierarchy containing, anywhere inside, this crafted subdirectory. NOTE: the vendor points out that &amp;#34;this attack can achieve no more than a hostile peer is already able to achieve within the scp protocol&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;utimes does not fail under normal circumstances. An unauthorized access vulnerabiitly exists in all versions of Portainer, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information. NOTE: Portainer has received no detail of this CVE report. There is also no response after multiple attempts of contacting the original source. In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/sca-2025-0009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1082 — Juniper JUNOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1082</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS im Zusammenhang mit OpenSSH ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, beliebigen Code auszuführen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS im Zusammenhang mit OpenSSH ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, beliebigen Code auszuführen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
