<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2021-01844</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2021-01844</link>
      <description>bdu:2021-01844</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2021-01844</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: BELL-CVE-2021-3449 — CVE-2021-3449 does not affect BellSoft software</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2021-3449</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2021-3449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-node-2021-3449 — NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-node-2021-3449</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: node&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: node&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-node-2021-3449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2021-avi-221 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles
permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2021-avi-221</link>
      <description>certfr-2021-avi-221</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2021-avi-221</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd — Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: March 2021</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-ghy28djd</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On March 25, 2021, the OpenSSL Project released a security advisory, OpenSSL Security Advisory [25 March 2021], [&amp;#34;https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt&amp;#34;] that disclosed two vulnerabilities.&#13;
&#13;
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to use a valid non-certificate authority (CA) certificate to act as a CA and sign a certificate for an arbitrary organization, user or device, or to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;On March 25, 2021, the OpenSSL Project released a security advisory, OpenSSL Security Advisory [25 March 2021], [&amp;#34;https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt&amp;#34;] that disclosed two vulnerabilities.&#13;
&#13;
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to use a valid non-certificate authority (CA) certificate to act as a CA and sign a certificate for an arbitrary organization, user or device, or to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-ghy28djd</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: CLEANSTART-2026-GK72927 — Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation
which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-gk72927</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the openssl package. Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer or NULL pointer dereference during MAC verification. See references for individual vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the openssl package. Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer or NULL pointer dereference during MAC verification. See references for individual vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-gk72927</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2021-39524</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2021-39524</link>
      <description>cnvd-2021-39524</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2021-39524</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-184444</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-184444</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-184444</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-184444</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2021-3449</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-3449</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2021-3449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-83mx-573x-5rw9 — openssl-src NULL pointer Dereference in signature_algorithms processing</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-83mx-573x-5rw9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: openssl-src&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: openssl-src&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-83mx-573x-5rw9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2021-3449</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-3449</link>
      <description>gsd-2021-3449</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2021-3449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-21-336-06 — Hitachi Energy APM Edge</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-21-336-06</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). Hitachi Energy is aware of public reports of this vulnerability in the following open-source software components: OpenSSL, LibSSL, libxml2 and GRUB2 bootloader. The vulnerability also affects some APM Edge products. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability could cause the product to become inaccessible. SEE NVD for full Description. In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not a…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). Hitachi Energy is aware of public reports of this vulnerability in the following open-source software components: OpenSSL, LibSSL, libxml2 and GRUB2 bootloader. The vulnerability also affects some APM Edge products. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability could cause the product to become inaccessible. SEE NVD for full Description. In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not a…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-21-336-06</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2021-1147 — openssl security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2021-1147</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).(CVE-2021-3449)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&#13;
&#13;
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).(CVE-2021-3449)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2021-1147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2021:0476-1 — Security update for openssl-1_1</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2021:0476-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2021:0476-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2021:1063 — Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2021:1063</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;openssl: NULL pointer dereference in signature_algorithms processing&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;openssl: NULL pointer dereference in signature_algorithms processing&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2021:1063</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2021-0055 — NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2021-0055</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: openssl-src&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation
ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits
the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial
ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL
pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service
attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which
is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this
issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: openssl-src&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation
ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits
the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial
ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL
pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service
attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which
is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this
issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2021-0055</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2021:0954-1 — Security update for openssl-1_1</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2021:0954-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2021:0954-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2021-3449</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2021-3449</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: postgresql-10, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: postgresql-12, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:20.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:20.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: postgresql-10, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: postgresql-12, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:20.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:20.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2021-3449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VDE-2021-025 — PHOENIX CONTACT: Security Advisory for PLCNext, ILC 2050 BI, FL MGUARD DM UNLIMITED, TC ROUTER und CLOUD CLIENT products</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/vde-2021-025</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A Denial of Service and a CA Check Problem have been identified in multiple openSSL 1.1.1 versions, which are utilized in the Phoenix Contact products listed above.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;A Denial of Service and a CA Check Problem have been identified in multiple openSSL 1.1.1 versions, which are utilized in the Phoenix Contact products listed above.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/vde-2021-025</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2022-0671 — OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-0671</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um kryptografische Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um kryptografische Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-0671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
