<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 03:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-37234</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-37234</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-37234</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-37234</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2020-6174</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-6174</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-6174</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-pwqf-9h7j-7mv8 — Incorrect threshold signature computation in TUF</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pwqf-9h7j-7mv8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tuf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Metadadata signature verification, as used in `tuf.client.updater`, counted each of multiple signatures with identical authorized keyids  separately towards the threshold. Therefore, an attacker with access to a valid signing key could create multiple valid signatures in order to meet the minimum threshold of keys before the metadata was considered valid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tuf maintainers would like to thank Erik MacLean of Analog Devices, Inc. for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
A [fix](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/pull/974) is available in version [0.12.2](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/releases/tag/v0.12.2) or newer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
No workarounds are known for this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References
* [CVE-2020-6174](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-6174)
* Pull request resolving the issue [PR 974](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/pull/974)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tuf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Metadadata signature verification, as used in `tuf.client.updater`, counted each of multiple signatures with identical authorized keyids  separately towards the threshold. Therefore, an attacker with access to a valid signing key could create multiple valid signatures in order to meet the minimum threshold of keys before the metadata was considered valid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tuf maintainers would like to thank Erik MacLean of Analog Devices, Inc. for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
A [fix](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/pull/974) is available in version [0.12.2](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/releases/tag/v0.12.2) or newer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
No workarounds are known for this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References
* [CVE-2020-6174](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-6174)
* Pull request resolving the issue [PR 974](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/pull/974)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pwqf-9h7j-7mv8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2020-6174</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-6174</link>
      <description>gsd-2020-6174</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-6174</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2020-147</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2020-147</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tuf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tuf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2020-147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2020-0024 — Improper uniqueness verification of signature threshold</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2020-0024</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: tough&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tough library, prior to 0.7.1, does not properly verify the uniqueness of
keys in the signatures provided to meet the threshold of cryptographic
signatures. It allows someone with access to a valid signing key to create
multiple valid signatures in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum
threshold of unique keys before the metadata is considered valid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AWS would like to thank Erick Tryzelaar of the Google Fuchsia Team for
reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fix is available in version 0.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CVE-2020-6174 is assigned to the same issue in the TUF reference
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, contact AWS Security
at aws-security@amazon.com.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: tough&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tough library, prior to 0.7.1, does not properly verify the uniqueness of
keys in the signatures provided to meet the threshold of cryptographic
signatures. It allows someone with access to a valid signing key to create
multiple valid signatures in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum
threshold of unique keys before the metadata is considered valid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AWS would like to thank Erick Tryzelaar of the Google Fuchsia Team for
reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fix is available in version 0.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CVE-2020-6174 is assigned to the same issue in the TUF reference
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, contact AWS Security
at aws-security@amazon.com.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2020-0024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
