<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 19:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2020-51570</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-51570</link>
      <description>cnvd-2020-51570</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-51570</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-36339</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-36339</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-36339</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-36339</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2020-4045</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-4045</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;SSB-DB version 20.0.0 has an information disclosure vulnerability. The get() method is supposed to only decrypt messages when you explicitly ask it to, but there is a bug where it&amp;#39;s decrypting any message that it can. This means that it is returning the decrypted content of private messages, which a malicious peer could use to get access to private data. This only affects peers running SSB-DB@20.0.0 who also have private messages, and is only known to be exploitable if you&amp;#39;re also running SSB-OOO (default in SSB-Server), which exposes a thin wrapper around get() to anonymous peers. This is fixed in version 20.0.1. Note that users of SSB-Server verion 16.0.0 should upgrade to 16.0.1 to get the fixed version of SSB-DB.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;SSB-DB version 20.0.0 has an information disclosure vulnerability. The get() method is supposed to only decrypt messages when you explicitly ask it to, but there is a bug where it&amp;#39;s decrypting any message that it can. This means that it is returning the decrypted content of private messages, which a malicious peer could use to get access to private data. This only affects peers running SSB-DB@20.0.0 who also have private messages, and is only known to be exploitable if you&amp;#39;re also running SSB-OOO (default in SSB-Server), which exposes a thin wrapper around get() to anonymous peers. This is fixed in version 20.0.1. Note that users of SSB-Server verion 16.0.0 should upgrade to 16.0.1 to get the fixed version of SSB-DB.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-4045</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mpgr-2cx9-327h — Information disclosure in SSB-DB</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mpgr-2cx9-327h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: ssb-db&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Servers running SSB-DB 20.0.0 (which is packaged with SSB-Server 16.0.0) must upgrade immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**There is no evidence that other SSB apps are vulnerable or that this problem has been exploited in the wild.**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `get()` method is supposed to only decrypt messages when you explicitly ask it to, but there&amp;#39;s a bug where it&amp;#39;s decrypting any message that it can. This means that it&amp;#39;s returning the decrypted content of private messages, which a malicious peer could use to get access to private data. This only affects peers running SSB-DB@20.0.0 who also have private messages, and is only known to be exploitable if you&amp;#39;re also running SSB-OOO (default in SSB-Server), which exposes a thin wrapper around `get()` to anonymous peers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, please upgrade to SSB-DB 20.0.1 (or SSB-Server 16.0.1) immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may be able to disable the most obvious attack vector, SSB-OOO, by disabling the plugin, but you should upgrade immediately anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, open an issue in [SSB-DB](https://github.com/ssbc/ssb-db/)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: ssb-db&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Servers running SSB-DB 20.0.0 (which is packaged with SSB-Server 16.0.0) must upgrade immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**There is no evidence that other SSB apps are vulnerable or that this problem has been exploited in the wild.**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `get()` method is supposed to only decrypt messages when you explicitly ask it to, but there&amp;#39;s a bug where it&amp;#39;s decrypting any message that it can. This means that it&amp;#39;s returning the decrypted content of private messages, which a malicious peer could use to get access to private data. This only affects peers running SSB-DB@20.0.0 who also have private messages, and is only known to be exploitable if you&amp;#39;re also running SSB-OOO (default in SSB-Server), which exposes a thin wrapper around `get()` to anonymous peers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, please upgrade to SSB-DB 20.0.1 (or SSB-Server 16.0.1) immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may be able to disable the most obvious attack vector, SSB-OOO, by disabling the plugin, but you should upgrade immediately anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, open an issue in [SSB-DB](https://github.com/ssbc/ssb-db/)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mpgr-2cx9-327h</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2020-4045</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-4045</link>
      <description>gsd-2020-4045</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-4045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
