<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2020-27231</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-27231</link>
      <description>cnvd-2020-27231</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-27231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-40246</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-40246</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-40246</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-40246</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2020-11009</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-11009</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In Rundeck before version 3.2.6, authenticated users can craft a request that reveals Execution data and logs and Job details that they are not authorized to see. Depending on the configuration and the way that Rundeck is used, this could result in anything between a high severity risk, or a very low risk. If access is tightly restricted and all users on the system have access to all projects, this is not really much of an issue. If access is wider and allows login for users that do not have access to any projects, or project access is restricted, there is a larger issue. If access is meant to be restricted and secrets, sensitive data, or intellectual property are exposed in Rundeck execution output and job data, the risk becomes much higher. This vulnerability is patched in version 3.2.6&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In Rundeck before version 3.2.6, authenticated users can craft a request that reveals Execution data and logs and Job details that they are not authorized to see. Depending on the configuration and the way that Rundeck is used, this could result in anything between a high severity risk, or a very low risk. If access is tightly restricted and all users on the system have access to all projects, this is not really much of an issue. If access is wider and allows login for users that do not have access to any projects, or project access is restricted, there is a larger issue. If access is meant to be restricted and secrets, sensitive data, or intellectual property are exposed in Rundeck execution output and job data, the risk becomes much higher. This vulnerability is patched in version 3.2.6&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-11009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5679-7qrc-5m7j — IDOR can reveal execution data and logs to unauthorized user in Rundeck</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5679-7qrc-5m7j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: org.rundeck:rundeck&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Authenticated users can craft a request that reveals Execution data and logs  and Job details that they are not authorized to see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Depending on the configuration and the way that Rundeck is used, this could result in anything between a high severity risk, or a very low risk. If access is tightly restricted and all users on the system have access to all projects, this is not really much of an issue. If access is wider and allows login for users that do not have access to any projects, or project access is restricted, there is a larger issue. If access is meant to be restricted and secrets, sensitive data, or intellectual property are exposed in Rundeck execution output and job data, the risk becomes much higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An authenticated user could craft a request to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* View Executions and download execution logs without access to `read` or `view` the associated Job, or ad-hoc resource.
* Get the list of running executions in a project, without Event `read` access, if they have `read` access to view the project.
* View the Options definitions of a Job without access to view the Job.
* View the definition of a workflow step of a Job without access to view the Job.
* View the SCM diff of a modified Job definition if SCM is enabled, without Project `export` access level.
* View the New User Profile Form for a different username, without User `admin` access. Note: they would not be allowed to create or modify a profile for a different user, or reveal any user…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: org.rundeck:rundeck&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Authenticated users can craft a request that reveals Execution data and logs  and Job details that they are not authorized to see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Depending on the configuration and the way that Rundeck is used, this could result in anything between a high severity risk, or a very low risk. If access is tightly restricted and all users on the system have access to all projects, this is not really much of an issue. If access is wider and allows login for users that do not have access to any projects, or project access is restricted, there is a larger issue. If access is meant to be restricted and secrets, sensitive data, or intellectual property are exposed in Rundeck execution output and job data, the risk becomes much higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An authenticated user could craft a request to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* View Executions and download execution logs without access to `read` or `view` the associated Job, or ad-hoc resource.
* Get the list of running executions in a project, without Event `read` access, if they have `read` access to view the project.
* View the Options definitions of a Job without access to view the Job.
* View the definition of a workflow step of a Job without access to view the Job.
* View the SCM diff of a modified Job definition if SCM is enabled, without Project `export` access level.
* View the New User Profile Form for a different username, without User `admin` access. Note: they would not be allowed to create or modify a profile for a different user, or reveal any user…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5679-7qrc-5m7j</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2020-11009</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-11009</link>
      <description>gsd-2020-11009</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-11009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
