<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 17:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2019-00985</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2019-00985</link>
      <description>bdu:2019-00985</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2019-00985</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: BELL-CVE-2019-1559 — CVE-2019-1559 does not affect BellSoft software</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2019-1559</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2019-1559</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2019-avi-080 — Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet à un
attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidential…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2019-avi-080</link>
      <description>certfr-2019-avi-080</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2019-avi-080</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2019-05906</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2019-05906</link>
      <description>cnvd-2019-05906</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2019-05906</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-185592</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-185592</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-185592</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-185592</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2019-1559</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2019-1559</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2019-1559</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9ccq-7hvh-cv7p</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9ccq-7hvh-cv7p</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9ccq-7hvh-cv7p</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2019-1559</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2019-1559</link>
      <description>gsd-2019-1559</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2019-1559</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2019:1105-1 — Security update for openssl-1_0_0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2019:1105-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_0_0&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_0_0&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2019:1105-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHBA-2020:0547 — Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: Container Image Rebuild for Ansible Tower 3.4 Dependency</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhba-2020:0547</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;glibc: getaddrinfo should reject IP addresses with trailing characters ROHNP: Key Extraction Side Channel in Multiple Crypto Libraries openssl: timing side channel attack in the DSA signature algorithm procps: Local privilege escalation in top LibRaw: DoS in parse_rollei function in internal/dcraw_common.cpp LibRaw: DoS in parse_sinar_ia function in internal/dcraw_common.cpp nss: Cache side-channel variant of the Bleichenbacher attack binutils: Stack Exhaustion in the demangling functions provided by libiberty binutils: NULL pointer dereference in work_stuff_copy_to_from in cplus-dem.c. curl: NTLM password overflow via integer overflow python: Missing salt initialization in _elementtree.c module systemd: line splitting via fgets() allows for state injection during daemon-reexec elfutils: Heap-based buffer over-read in libdw/dwarf_getaranges.c:dwarf_getaranges() via crafted file elfutils: Double-free due to double decompression of sections in crafted ELF causes crash elfutils: Heap-based buffer over-read in libdw/dwarf_getabbrev.c and libwd/dwarf_hasattr.c causes crash curl: Heap-based buffer over-read in the curl tool warning formatting systemd: out-of-bounds read when parsing a crafted syslog message systemd: kills privileged process if unprivileged PIDFile was tampered elfutils: invalid memory address dereference was discovered in dwfl_segment_report_module.c in libdwfl elfutils: eu-size cannot handle recursive ar files elfutils: Divide-by-zero in arlib_add_symbols functio…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;glibc: getaddrinfo should reject IP addresses with trailing characters ROHNP: Key Extraction Side Channel in Multiple Crypto Libraries openssl: timing side channel attack in the DSA signature algorithm procps: Local privilege escalation in top LibRaw: DoS in parse_rollei function in internal/dcraw_common.cpp LibRaw: DoS in parse_sinar_ia function in internal/dcraw_common.cpp nss: Cache side-channel variant of the Bleichenbacher attack binutils: Stack Exhaustion in the demangling functions provided by libiberty binutils: NULL pointer dereference in work_stuff_copy_to_from in cplus-dem.c. curl: NTLM password overflow via integer overflow python: Missing salt initialization in _elementtree.c module systemd: line splitting via fgets() allows for state injection during daemon-reexec elfutils: Heap-based buffer over-read in libdw/dwarf_getaranges.c:dwarf_getaranges() via crafted file elfutils: Double-free due to double decompression of sections in crafted ELF causes crash elfutils: Heap-based buffer over-read in libdw/dwarf_getabbrev.c and libwd/dwarf_hasattr.c causes crash curl: Heap-based buffer over-read in the curl tool warning formatting systemd: out-of-bounds read when parsing a crafted syslog message systemd: kills privileged process if unprivileged PIDFile was tampered elfutils: invalid memory address dereference was discovered in dwfl_segment_report_module.c in libdwfl elfutils: eu-size cannot handle recursive ar files elfutils: Divide-by-zero in arlib_add_symbols functio…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhba-2020:0547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2019:0572-1 — Security update for openssl-1_0_0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2019:0572-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_0_0&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-1_0_0&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2019:0572-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2019-1559</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2019-1559</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: openssl1.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: openssl1.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable &amp;#34;non-stitched&amp;#34; ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2019-1559</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2022-0462 — OpenSSL: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-0462</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-0462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
