https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:16:57 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2021-01743 bdu:2021-01743 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2021-01743 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2019-14870 <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> <p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2019-14870 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2019-avi-614 certfr-2019-avi-614 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2019-avi-614 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2024-ny89465 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: heimdal</p> <p>Security vulnerability affects the heimdal package. All Samba versions 4.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: heimdal</p> <p>Security vulnerability affects the heimdal package. All Samba versions 4.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2024-ny89465 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-32373 cnvd-2020-32373 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-32373 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-56661 EUVD-2026-56661 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-56661 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2019-14870 <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2019-14870 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6q5r-wx7g-rq28 <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6q5r-wx7g-rq28 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2019-14870 gsd-2019-14870 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2019-14870 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2023:0019-1 <p>Security update for libheimdal</p> <p>Security update for libheimdal</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2023:0019-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2019-14870 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: samba, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: samba, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: samba</p> <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: samba, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: samba, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: samba</p> <p>All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authentication, by forcing all tickets for these clients to be non-forwardable. In AD this is implemented by a user attribute delegation_not_allowed (aka not-delegated), which translates to disallow-forwardable. However the Samba AD DC does not do that for S4U2Self and does set the forwardable flag even if the impersonated client has the not-delegated flag set.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2019-14870 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-2051 <p>Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Samba ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.</p> <p>Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Samba ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2022-2051