<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 00:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2015-02016</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2015-02016</link>
      <description>bdu:2015-02016</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2015-02016</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certa-2006-avi-524 — &lt;span class="textit"&gt;ProFTPD&lt;/span&gt; est un serveur de transfert de
fichier pour le protocole FTP (RFC 959). Plusieurs v…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certa-2006-avi-524</link>
      <description>certa-2006-avi-524</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certa-2006-avi-524</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-144250</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-144250</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-144250</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-144250</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2006-6171</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2006-6171</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow.  NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure.  NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow.  NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure.  NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2006-6171</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-fg3g-4994-3829</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fg3g-4994-3829</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;** DISPUTED **  ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow.  NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure.  NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;** DISPUTED **  ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow.  NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure.  NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fg3g-4994-3829</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2006-6171</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2006-6171</link>
      <description>gsd-2006-6171</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2006-6171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
