<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T11:21:08.369782+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-46517</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-46517 — LMDeploy: Hardcoded trust_remote_code=True is an implicit unsafe remote-code load path with no user opt-out</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:21:08.405302+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> InternLM lmdeploy</p>
<p>LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. In versions 0.12.3 and prior, hardcoded "trust_remote_code=True" enables HF supply-chain RCE without user opt-in. Version 0.13.0 patches the issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-46517"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9xq9-36w5-q796</id>
    <title>GHSA-9xq9-36w5-q796 — lmdeploy: Hardcoded trust_remote_code=True is an implicit unsafe remote-code load path with no user opt-out</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:21:08.405385+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: lmdeploy</p>
<p>&gt; ## 📋 Reframing (2026-05-02): implicit unsafe remote-code path, not "supply-chain"
&gt;
&gt; The accurate description of this vulnerability is:
&gt; **"`get_model_arch` and related helpers hardcode `trust_remote_code=True`
&gt; with no opt-out, creating an implicit unsafe remote-code load path
&gt; on every model fetch."**
&gt;
&gt; What this report does NOT claim:
&gt; * It is NOT a network-attack RCE — the user supplies the model
&gt;   reference; LMDeploy honors it.
&gt; * It is NOT a "supply chain" CVE in the classical sense (where a
&gt;   benign upstream is compromised) — the user explicitly types the
&gt;   repo name.
&gt;
&gt; What this report DOES claim:
&gt; * Other inference frameworks (vLLM, TGI, Hugging Face transformers
&gt;   itself) all expose `--trust-remote-code` as **opt-in** so that
&gt;   users who consciously load known-safe repos can opt in, while
&gt;   users following a tutorial cannot accidentally execute attacker
&gt;   Python by typing a wrong repo name.
&gt; * LMDeploy's hardcoded True is an **implicit** trust-boundary
&gt;   override that violates HF Transformers' default-secure stance
&gt;   (`trust_remote_code=False` since transformers ≥ 4.30).
&gt; * The fix is a one-line CLI flag (`--trust-remote-code`) defaulting
&gt;   False, threaded through the three sites, matching the rest of
&gt;   the ecosystem.
&gt;
&gt; Severity should be assessed as **hardening / safe-by-default**,
&gt; not as full unauthenticated RCE. CVSS revised to **5.5 Medium**
&gt; (`AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H` × user-must-load qualifier).
&gt;
&gt; Runtim…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9xq9-36w5-q796"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
