<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T08:29:12.239740+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-89779</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-89779 — fs/ntfs3: validate ef-&gt;size covers the record's name and value</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T08:29:12.255431+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs/ntfs3: validate ef-&gt;size covers the record's name and value</p>
<p>When an EA record has a non-zero ef-&gt;size, ntfs_read_ea() only checks
that the record fits in the remaining buffer (ea_size &gt; bytes), not that
ef-&gt;size is large enough to hold the record's own name_len + 1 + elength.</p>
<p>A crafted image can pass validation with, e.g., ef-&gt;size = 24 but
elength = 0xffff. ntfs_get_ea() then trusts elength and copies it out of
the undersized record, reading past the kmalloc(info-&gt;size) allocation
and leaking heap memory to userspace via getxattr():</p>
<p>BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ntfs_get_ea (fs/ntfs3/xattr.c:302)
 Read of size 65535 at addr ffff888100794550 by task exploit
  __asan_memcpy (mm/kasan/shadow.c:105)
  ntfs_get_ea (fs/ntfs3/xattr.c:302)
  ntfs_getxattr (fs/ntfs3/xattr.c:848)
  __vfs_getxattr (fs/xattr.c:441)
  vfs_getxattr (fs/xattr.c:474)
  do_getxattr (fs/xattr.c:800)
  path_getxattrat (fs/xattr.c:868)
  do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)</p>
<p>The buggy address is located 80 bytes inside of
  allocated 84-byte region in cache kmalloc-96</p>
<p>Compute the size the record needs and require ef-&gt;size to cover it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-89779"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
