<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-17T10:53:43.012616+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-24845</id>
    <title>CVE-2022-24845 — Integer bounds error in Vyper</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T10:53:43.045055+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> vyperlang vyper</p>
<p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-24845"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-198</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2022-198</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T10:53:43.045112+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: vyper</p>
<p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-198"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
