<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-07T02:35:01.787722+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-93203</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-93203 — batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T02:35:01.790018+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add</p>
<p>batadv_bla_add_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of
claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it
handles a claim, it needs to either</p>
<p>* add the new claim's CRC to the backbone CRC
* remove the already existing claim's CRC from the old backbone and add it
  to the new backbone</p>
<p>But when the "new" claim code was running in parallel to the "change
backbone" code, it can happen that the CRC was invalid because the
backbone_gw of the claim was changed twice in the "new" claim code path:</p>
<p>* CPU0 creates the claim for gateway A and publishes it in the claim
  hash. The crc16 of the address has not yet been added to A's crc at
  this point.</p>
<p>* CPU1 processes a claim frame of gateway B for the same client, finds
  the just published claim, and performs the ownership change: it
  switches the pointer to B, removes the crc16 from A's crc - which
  never contained it - and adds it to B's crc.</p>
<p>* CPU0 continues behind the creation branch, unconditionally switches
  the pointer back to A without compensating B's crc (its remove_crc
  is false for the creation path), and finally adds the crc16 to A's
  crc</p>
<p>The CRC is then wrong for both:</p>
<p>* claim belongs to A: but CRC is not part of backbone A's CRC
* claim doesn't belong to B: CRC is still part of backbone B's CRC</p>
<p>This wrong CRC is never recomputated from th…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-93203"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
