<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T21:28:48.043753+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-76347</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-76347 — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through the Report Notifications REST API in Splunk Secure Gateway</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T21:28:48.057641+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway</p>
<p>In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in report notifications to send system-authenticated requests to internal Splunk services, which could allow for changes to Search Head Cluster state and a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate report notification path values before it sends internal requests.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-76347"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
