<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T12:36:10.358459+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-343763</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-343763</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T12:36:10.401854+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-343763</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-343763"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-68930</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-68930</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T12:36:10.401889+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Russh is a Rust SSH client &amp; server library. Prior to 0.62.5, russh dispatches channel-scoped Handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs, server_read_authenticated, and the exec_request callback. Version 0.62.5 fixes the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-68930"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m65r-rprj-r5rg</id>
    <title>GHSA-m65r-rprj-r5rg — Russh: Channel-scoped server callbacks can be reached without an open channel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T12:36:10.401922+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> crates.io: russh</p>
<p>There is a server-side channel state issue in `russh`.</p>
<p>After a client is authenticated, `russh` can dispatch channel-scoped handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed. In the strongest reproduced case, the client does not send `SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN` at all. It authenticates normally, then sends `SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST` packets with request type `exec` for a range of recipient channel IDs. `russh` still calls the server application's `exec_request` handler.</p>
<p>This is not an authentication bypass. A valid login is required. The issue is that the SSH channel lifecycle is not enforced before channel-scoped callbacks are delivered to the application.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>An authenticated client can bypass the server application's channel-open policy.</p>
<p>A server may deny session channels by returning `false` from `Handler::channel_open_session`. A server may also assume that callbacks such as `exec_request`, `shell_request`, `subsystem_request`, `data`, `channel_eof`, or `channel_close` are only delivered for channels that were opened and confirmed by the SSH transport layer.</p>
<p>That assumption does not hold in the vulnerable path. A malicious authenticated peer can send channel-scoped messages for arbitrary recipient channel IDs and cause handler callbacks to run even though no channel exists.</p>
<p>The exact impact depends on the downstream application. For many SSH server use cases, `exec_request`, `shell_request`, or `subsystem_request` start commands, job…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m65r-rprj-r5rg"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
