<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-10T06:29:13.181570+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-290351</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-290351</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T06:29:13.286593+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-290351</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-290351"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-5774</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-5774</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T06:29:13.286648+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Improper synchronization of the userTokens map in the API server in Canonical Juju 4.0.5, 3.6.20, and 2.9.56 may allow an authenticated user to possibly cause a denial of service on the server or possibly reuse a single-use discharge token.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-5774"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7m55-2hr4-pw78</id>
    <title>GHSA-7m55-2hr4-pw78 — Juju: In-Memory Token Store for Discharge Tokens Lacks Concurrency Safety and Persistence</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T06:29:13.286700+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/juju/juju</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>The localLoginHandlers struct in the Juju API server maintains an in-memory map to store discharge tokens following successful local authentication. This map is accessed concurrently from multiple HTTP handler goroutines without any synchronization primitive protecting it. The absence of a mutex or equivalent mechanism means that concurrent reads, writes, and deletes on the map can trigger Go runtime panics and may allow a discharge token to be consumed more than once before deletion completes.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>When a user authenticates through the local login flow, a discharge token is generated and stored in a plain `map[string]string` field named userTokens. The form handler writes to this map when authentication succeeds, and the third-party caveat checker reads from and deletes from the same map when a discharge request arrives. Both code paths execute inside goroutines dispatched by the HTTP server, meaning concurrent requests will access the map simultaneously.</p>
<p>Go's runtime detects concurrent map access and will terminate the process with a fatal error when a write races with another write or read. This makes the API server susceptible to a denial-of-service attack from any authenticated user who can trigger simultaneous discharge requests. Beyond the crash scenario, the read-then-delete sequence in the caveat checker is not atomic. Two goroutines processing the same token concurrently may both pass the existence check before either executes the deletion, a…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7m55-2hr4-pw78"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
