<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T08:35:11.436120+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329803</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-329803</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T08:35:11.484203+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-329803</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329803"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53928</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-53928</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T08:35:11.484240+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user's refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53928"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r989-7g3j-wjhw</id>
    <title>GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw — NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T08:35:11.484279+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: nocodb</p>
<p>### Summary
A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh
JWTs even after the user reset their password.</p>
<p>### Details
`passwordChange` and `passwordReset` deleted the user's refresh tokens, but
`passwordForgot` only rotated `token_version` and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not
call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id)`. An attacker holding a captured
refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim
triggered the recovery flow.</p>
<p>### Impact
Persistent unauthorized access after password recovery. Once a refresh token leaks, the
documented "Forgot password" recovery flow did not in fact revoke the attacker's
session.</p>
<p>### Credit
This issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.com/bugbunny-research).</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r989-7g3j-wjhw"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
