<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.441049+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-07452</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-07452</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.519345+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-07452</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-07452"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-319097</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-319097</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.519387+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-319097</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-319097"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45396</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-45396</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.519403+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, the POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback endpoint in Open WebUI v0.9.2 is vulnerable to mass assignment via FeedbackForm, which uses model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow'). Due to an insecure dictionary merge order in insert_new_feedback(), an authenticated attacker can inject a user_id field in the request body that overwrites the server-derived value, creating feedback records attributed to any arbitrary user. This corrupts the model evaluation leaderboard (Elo ratings) and enables identity spoofing. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.5.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45396"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g</id>
    <title>GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g — Open WebUI: Mass Assignment via FeedbackForm extra=allow Allows Feedback User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulat…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.519440+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: open-webui</p>
<p># Mass Assignment in Feedback Creation Allows User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulation</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>The `POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback` endpoint in Open WebUI v0.9.2 is vulnerable to mass assignment via `FeedbackForm`, which uses `model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow')`. Due to an insecure dictionary merge order in `insert_new_feedback()`, an authenticated attacker can inject a `user_id` field in the request body that overwrites the server-derived value, creating feedback records attributed to any arbitrary user. This corrupts the model evaluation leaderboard (Elo ratings) and enables identity spoofing.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>The vulnerability exists in two layers:</p>
<p>### 1. Model Layer — Insecure Dict Merge Order</p>
<p>**File:** `backend/open_webui/models/feedbacks.py`, lines 148–160</p>
<p>```python
async def insert_new_feedback(
    self, user_id: str, form_data: FeedbackForm, db: Optional[AsyncSession] = None
) -&gt; Optional[FeedbackModel]:
    async with get_async_db_context(db) as db:
        id = str(uuid.uuid4())
        feedback = FeedbackModel(
            **{
                'id': id,
                'user_id': user_id,       # ← Server-set from auth token
                'version': 0,
                **form_data.model_dump(),  # ← OVERWRITES 'id', 'user_id', 'version'
                'created_at': int(time.time()),
                'updated_at': int(time.time()),
            }
        )
```</p>
<p>In Python, when a dictionary literal contains duplicate keys, the **last value wins…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2756</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2756 — Open WebUI: Mass Assignment via FeedbackForm extra=allow Allows Feedback User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulat…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:42:49.519516+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: open-webui</p>
<p># Mass Assignment in Feedback Creation Allows User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulation</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>The `POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback` endpoint in Open WebUI v0.9.2 is vulnerable to mass assignment via `FeedbackForm`, which uses `model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow')`. Due to an insecure dictionary merge order in `insert_new_feedback()`, an authenticated attacker can inject a `user_id` field in the request body that overwrites the server-derived value, creating feedback records attributed to any arbitrary user. This corrupts the model evaluation leaderboard (Elo ratings) and enables identity spoofing.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>The vulnerability exists in two layers:</p>
<p>### 1. Model Layer — Insecure Dict Merge Order</p>
<p>**File:** `backend/open_webui/models/feedbacks.py`, lines 148–160</p>
<p>```python
async def insert_new_feedback(
    self, user_id: str, form_data: FeedbackForm, db: Optional[AsyncSession] = None
) -&gt; Optional[FeedbackModel]:
    async with get_async_db_context(db) as db:
        id = str(uuid.uuid4())
        feedback = FeedbackModel(
            **{
                'id': id,
                'user_id': user_id,       # ← Server-set from auth token
                'version': 0,
                **form_data.model_dump(),  # ← OVERWRITES 'id', 'user_id', 'version'
                'created_at': int(time.time()),
                'updated_at': int(time.time()),
            }
        )
```</p>
<p>In Python, when a dictionary literal contains duplicate keys, the **last value wins…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2756"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
