<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-12T15:04:54.357029+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322186</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-322186</title>
    <updated>2026-10-12T15:04:54.369069+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-322186</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322186"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-44502</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-44502</title>
    <updated>2026-10-12T15:04:54.369101+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Bugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. Prior to 2.1.3, Bugsink’s webhook URL validation could be (partially) bypassed because of a mismatch in URL parsing. The original validation logic parsed webhook URLs with Python’s urllib.parse.urlparse, then sent the request with requests.post. For malformed inputs involving backslashes and @, those components can disagree about where the authority ends and which hostname is the real target. A URL may therefore appear to target an allowlisted public hostname during validation, while the HTTP client actually connects to a different host. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.3.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-44502"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fp53-qcf8-2xx2</id>
    <title>GHSA-fp53-qcf8-2xx2 — Bunsink has an SSRF bypass in `validate_webhook_url`</title>
    <updated>2026-10-12T15:04:54.369136+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: bugsink</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Bugsink’s webhook URL validation in versions 2.1.2 and earlier could be (partially) bypassed because of a mismatch in URL parsing.</p>
<p>In some malformed URLs, Python’s standard URL  parser (urllib) and the HTTP client stack (requests / urllib3) do not agree on which host is actually being targeted. That could allow a webhook URL to pass Bugsink’s outbound-host checks while the actual HTTP request is sent somewhere else.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>This issue affects Bugsink’s outbound webhook integrations.</p>
<p>An attacker who can supply or influence a webhook URL may be able to make Bugsink send an outbound HTTP POST request to a host that should have been blocked by the webhook validation logic, including loopback,
private, or otherwise non-allowlisted destinations.</p>
<p>The practical impact is limited:</p>
<p>- this is an outbound webhook SSRF issue, not a general-purpose proxy
- Bugsink does not follow redirects for these webhook requests
- the request shape is constrained by how the malformed URL is normalized by the HTTP client
- this does not give arbitrary control over every possible request path</p>
<p>In other words, this is a real validation bypass, but it is narrower than a full arbitrary-request primitive.</p>
<p>## Technical Details</p>
<p>The original validation logic parsed webhook URLs with Python’s urllib.parse.urlparse, then sent the request with requests.post.</p>
<p>For malformed inputs involving backslashes and @, those components can disagree about where the authority ends and which hostname is t…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fp53-qcf8-2xx2"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2405</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2405 — Bunsink has an SSRF bypass in `validate_webhook_url`</title>
    <updated>2026-10-12T15:04:54.369186+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: bugsink</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Bugsink’s webhook URL validation in versions 2.1.2 and earlier could be (partially) bypassed because of a mismatch in URL parsing.</p>
<p>In some malformed URLs, Python’s standard URL  parser (urllib) and the HTTP client stack (requests / urllib3) do not agree on which host is actually being targeted. That could allow a webhook URL to pass Bugsink’s outbound-host checks while the actual HTTP request is sent somewhere else.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>This issue affects Bugsink’s outbound webhook integrations.</p>
<p>An attacker who can supply or influence a webhook URL may be able to make Bugsink send an outbound HTTP POST request to a host that should have been blocked by the webhook validation logic, including loopback,
private, or otherwise non-allowlisted destinations.</p>
<p>The practical impact is limited:</p>
<p>- this is an outbound webhook SSRF issue, not a general-purpose proxy
- Bugsink does not follow redirects for these webhook requests
- the request shape is constrained by how the malformed URL is normalized by the HTTP client
- this does not give arbitrary control over every possible request path</p>
<p>In other words, this is a real validation bypass, but it is narrower than a full arbitrary-request primitive.</p>
<p>## Technical Details</p>
<p>The original validation logic parsed webhook URLs with Python’s urllib.parse.urlparse, then sent the request with requests.post.</p>
<p>For malformed inputs involving backslashes and @, those components can disagree about where the authority ends and which hostname is t…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2405"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
