Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.

'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.

Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.

This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.

Affected: Hex: absinthe

### Summary An unauthenticated attacker can stall an Absinthe-backed GraphQL endpoint by submitting a query that contains many fragment definitions. The fragment-name uniqueness validation phase is O(N²) in the number of fragments, so a single modestly-sized request burns seconds of CPU per worker, and sustained traffic exhausts the worker pool (denial of service).

Introduced like with https://github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/commit/0b46e3bcc06c0d3797bacd64761b908a84646c1d#diff-e540120c6a98cc1013be110d08e9d029511b9aabd26ad5f7f643c36834caac14

### Details `Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames` (`lib/absinthe/phase/document/validation/unique_fragment_names.ex:14-40`) walks every fragment in `input.fragments` via `run/2`, calling `process/2` on each one. `process/2` then calls `duplicate?/2`, which evaluates `Enum.count(fragments, fn f -> f.name == name end)` — a full linear scan of the fragment list — for every individual fragment. The result is `N · N` name comparisons per document.

`input.fragments` is built directly from the GraphQL query text the caller sends at the head of the pipeline, so `N` is attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition (`fragment a on T{f}`) is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60 000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this one phase. Phoenix's default 8 MB body limit allows substantially larger blow-ups if operators have not lowered it. Nothing in this module caps `N`.

The fix is to ag…